AK AL AR AZ CA CO CT DE FL GA HI IA ID IL IN KS KY LA MA MD ME MI MN MO MS MT NC ND NE NH NJ NM NV NY OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VA VT WA WI WV WY DC USA

SREC Developments

Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia Decertifies Solar Energy

Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia Decertifies Solar Energy - Systems Not Located in the District of Columbia

 

Solar systems that were located outside of the District of Columbia had a chance to become certified in the District prior to February 1, 2011. Those systems that were certified will become de-certified as of January 1, 2025.

Background: Prior to February 1, 2011 SRECs in PJM and also as far away as New York could be sold into DC for compliance. However, DC prices were very low at that time. In fact, most DC located solar was sold into PA because at the time PA prices were higher. Some system owners outside of DC registered in DC. They lucked out when laws were changed in DC making DC SRECS go higher and also ending the ability to register in DC. There were some installers who sold systems in DC and in the contracts had the system owners sell the installer the rights to the SRECs. Those same installers then lobbied the Public Service Commission of DC to increase the prices and exclude all other systems. These solar owners collected millions of dollars in SREC payments from electric users in DC over the last decade due to that law change. Now the loophole is being closed.

If your system is currently certified in DC but is located outside of DC or if it is not on a feeder line connected with DC it will become decertified for DC compliance beginning with your SRECs generated in January 2025. You will be able to sell them in your state as long as it is certified in that state. System owners who did not register in their state may actually have to do an initial registration. Contact Flett Exchange and we will assist you.

Here is the language:

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

1325 G STREET, N.W., SUITE 800

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005

ORDER

October 24, 2024

FORMAL CASE NO. 1181, IN THE MATTER OF THE INVESTIGATION INTO ELECTRIC SERVICES MARKET COMPETITION AND REGULATORY PRACTICES,

Order No. 22318

I. INTRODUCTION

1. By this Order, the Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia (“Commission”), pursuant to the Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard Amendment Act of 2024 (“Act”), decertifies, effective January 1, 2025, all solar energy systems not located within the District of Columbia (“District”), or in a location served by a distribution feeder serving the District, that were previously certified by the Commission to produce renewable energy credits meeting the solar requirement (“SREC”) of the Renewable Portfolio Standard (“RPS”) prior to February 1, 2011.

II. BACKGROUND

2. On July 26, 2024, the Council of the District of Columbia enacted the Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Support Act of 2024 (“Act”).1 On September 18, 2024, the Act passed Congressional Review and became law. The Act included Title VI, Subtitle B, also known as the Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard Amendment Act of 2024 (“RPS Amendment Act”).2 Notably, the RPS Amendment Act amended the language of D.C. Official Code § 34-1432 to mandate that:

“Any solar energy system not located within the District or in a location served by a distribution feeder serving the District and that was certified as eligible to produce renewable energy credits meeting the solar requirement of the renewable energy portfolio standard by the Commission prior to February 1, 2011, shall be decertified by the Commission effective January 1, 2025.”

III. DISCUSSION

3. Pursuant to the RPS Amendment Act, the Commission hereby decertifies, as of January 1, 2025, all solar energy systems that were certified to produce SRECs prior to February 1, 2011, not located within the District or served by a distribution feeder serving the District. A list of the applicable solar energy systems this Order decertifies is contained in the Appendix attached herein. The Commission clarifies that the RPS Amendment Act and this accompanying Order do not affect or decertify systems not located in the District, or in a location served by a distribution feeder serving the District, that were certified by the Commission for the generation of Tier One Renewable Energy Credits (“REC”) applicable to the non-solar portion of the RPS. However, any facility decertified by this Order specifically that wishes to continue to produce RECs for the non-solar portion of the District’s RPS must first be certified anew under 15 DCMR § 2902.4

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

4. On January 1, 2025, all solar energy systems not located within the District or in a location served by a distribution feeder serving the District that were certified prior to February 1, 2011, by the Commission to produce Solar Renewable Energy Credits, are hereby DECERTIFIED.

A TRUE COPY: BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION:

CHIEF CLERK: BRINDA WESTBROOK-SEDGWICK

COMMISSION SECRETARY

 

TAGS:
Washington DCSRECSolar

Flett Exchange Releases Maryland Residential Solar PV Installation Model

On July 30th 2024, Flett Exchange became the first broker to launch the Maryland Certified SREC market. Currently, homeowners with systems installed after 07/01/24 will begin generating Certified SRECs on 01/01/2025, which are expected to be worth around 1.5x the current Legacy MD SRECs. Homeowners in Maryland who are interested in the possibility of installing solar will benefit massively from these higher priced SRECs, and can enjoy the benefit of incentives like the Federal Investment Tax Credit and the MD FY2025 Solar Access Program, which is designed to provide grant money for low to moderate income residents. 

 

Flett Exchange has also released a free to use solar installation financial model. We suggest using this model to fully realize the advantages and long term cash flows of a solar investment before having a conversation with a solar installer. Flett Exchange is a neutral third party that does not profit off of the installation of a solar array; we simply broker SRECs produced by homeowners. This affords us the unique position to offer unbiased, informative, and realistic forecasts and consulting on solar investments. If you are interested in potentially going solar, contact Flett Exchange for a zero cost consultation service and we can help match you with a solar installation company. The goal of Flett Exchange, ultimately, is to broker more SREC deals; we are not involved in any capacity with the process of installing solar arrays. It is our hope that this complementary service will steer you in our direction to sell your SRECs post installation. 

 

MD Solar PV Installation Cash Flow Model

 

Listed below are some key assumptions of the model: 

 

  • The Maryland Energy Administration will provide grants of $750/kW  with a $7,500 cap to low to middle income homeowners for installation of a residential solar system

  • The Maryland utility bill inflation rate is 2.83% annually. This number is derived from the average utility bill from 2014-2023 for five major state power companies: Delmarva Power, PEPCO, SMECO, BGE, and Potomac Edison. 

  • A residential solar installation will yield positive cash flow from SREC income, as well as an implied positive cash flow from avoided utility costs

  • The SACP set by the Maryland RPS will decrease incrementally as expected, and this benchmark will serve as a proxy for yearly SREC prices throughout the life of the system 

TAGS:
Federal GrantsPress ReleasesSRECResearchMaryland Certified

Maryland Certified SREC Market Launch

Flett Exchange is the first SREC exchange to launch a market for Maryland Certified SRECs. These RECs are available to Maryland residential solar PV systems installed after 07/01/2024, as per the The Maryland Solar Bill.

These RECs prices will be closely correlated with Maryland’s legacy market, which is what all systems installed prior to this July produce. Maryland utility companies, who are required by the state of Maryland to make an alternative compliance payment (ACP) of $55.00 in 2025, can satisfy this requirement easily with the purchase of new Certified SRECs, which satisfy 150% of the ACP.

 

This presents a unique opportunity to homeowners who sell their credits to Flett Exchange. Since energy companies are able to get a discount by buying these RECs, homeowners can sell them for more. Currently, the bid for Maryland Certified SRECs is $75.50. To learn more about the state incentives in Maryland available for FY25, review the early blog post about Maryland Certified SRECs and Cost Effective Solar Array Installation. If you are interested in taking advantage of the benefits of going solar, use the Maryland Solar Installation Financial Model and give us a call at 201-209-0234 to speak with a member of our team about your options.

TAGS:
MarylandPress ReleasesSRECMaryland Certified

Maryland Certified SRECs and Cost Effective Solar Array Installation

Are you a Maryland resident interested in installing a cost effective solar array on your home or business? If so, this news is for you!

 

With the recent passage of SB0783, known as the Brighter Tomorrow Act, the Maryland Energy Administration has proposed funding a grant pool of $18 million for FY2025 in compliance with the aforementioned bill [9-2016] . This ACT is specifically designed to enable low to moderate income Marylanders gain access to affordable renewable energy systems. Qualifying homeowners may be entitled to up to $7,500 in reimbursement for their solar system installation cost. ($750 per Kw up to 10Kw)

Additionally, under the Inflation Reduction Act signed by President Biden in 2022, homeowners nationwide can take advantage of a tax credit to offset the cost of solar installation as defined in 26 U.S.C. § 25D. This covers 30% of your installation cost. If you don’t have the taxable appetite Flett Exchange can sell your tax credit for you.

 

Flett Exchange is the easiest one stop option to manage your personal solar project finance and subsequent account management for sale of Certified MD SRECs (for more information on the new Maryland SREC program for systems installed after 01/01/2025, see the Maryland Solar Bill.)

 

Once you have decided to install a cost-effective solar system on your home and want to begin selling your certified SRECs, Flett Exchange will:

 

Provide a no-cost estimate for your system installation, and 

 

  1. Submit your grant application to the state of Maryland 

  2. Connect you with a local installation company 

  3. Register your array with PJM GATS

  4. Manage the sale of your Certified SRECs (estimated to be worth $75/KW in 2025) 

  5. Provide 5 day per week phone and email support for questions and concerns you may have along the way 

TAGS:
MarylandFederal GrantsPress ReleasesSRECResearchMaryland Certified

When is My New Jersey Solar Array Going to Stop Producing SRECs?

Solar installed in New Jersey prior to 2017 generate SRECs for 15 years. After that time they generate Class 1 RECs. SRECs are worth $200 or more. Class 1 RECs trade for $30 today and go only as high as $50.

 

It is confusing as to when your system is going to convert from SRECs to Class 1 RECs. Here is what you need to do to figure this out.

  1. Look up your initial online date for your solar facility on GATS. This is listed under the facility and it is also on each SREC as “Vintage (Utility Interconnection Date), ex. 05/2009.
  2. New Jersey law says that a solar array generates SRECs for 15 full energy years. This means that you get SRECs for up to 15 years and eleven months, depending on what month your array went online.
  3. Energy years start in June and end in May.

 

Here is a Key:

 

If your array went online from June 2008 and up to and including May 2009 the last SREC you will mint is May 2024. Your first Class 1 REC will be your June 2024 generation.

 

If your array went online from June 2009 and up to and including May 2010 the last SREC you will mint is May 2025. Your first Class 1 REC will be your June 2025 generation.

 

And so on…

 

When you produce Class 1 RECs you sell them the same way on Flett Exchange. You can either check the price on the Flett Exchange website https://www.flettexchange.com/ and transfer them on GATS to Flett Exchange, LLC or you can list them for sale on the Flett Exchange trading platform and transfer them on GATs to Flett Exchange,LLC. when you are filled. 

 

Since Class 1 RECs are lower priced we suggest to wait 6 months to a year to sell them in bulk. Class 1 RECs are only good for 3 energy years so do not wait too long or they will go worthless. SRECs are good for up to 5 energy years. 

 

It is very important to enter your meter readings within 30 days after your system gets converted to a class 1 facility. If you do not put in your meter readings within 30 days all of the months that you deserve to earn SRECs will be created as Class 1 recs. You may lose thousands of dollars!!!

(As of this writing we believe GATS is fixing this issue but we cannot confirm. Best practice is to make sure the meter reading is entered in a timely fashion.)

 

GATS will send you an email that says the following:

 

“Your solar electric generation facility's NJ SREC eligibility period will reach the end of its qualification life within Energy Year ("EY") 2021 which ends on May 31, 202X. All generation should be entered prior to the last business day in June. Facility eligibility will be changed from Solar (SREC) to Class I (REC) on July 1, 202X. “

 

Flett Exchange is the largest exchange for New Jersey Solar Class 1 RECs. Many energy companies compete to purchase SRECs and Class 1 RECs on our exchange which ensures you get the going market price. 

 

Edit: Updated GATS terminology.

 

TAGS:
New JerseySRECResearchSolarNJ Class 1

Maryland Solar Bill - HB1435 / SB0737 (Updated 5/13)

 

The Governor of Maryland currently has bill HB1435/SB0737 on his desk for signature. Named “The Brighter Tomorrow Act”, we have listed some of the changes that will take place if it is signed into law:

  1. Only NEW solar installed from July 1, 2024 to January 1, 2028, before hitting total installed megawatt limits per category, will be classified as “Certified SRECs” and compliance buyers will be able to use them to satisfy 150% of their compliance obligation per Certified SREC. 

  2. All RECs will have a 5 year life. Currently, the life is 3 years.

  3. The first 300MW AC of solar 20kW and less qualify.

  4. The first 270 MW AC of solar 20kW to 5MW qualify.

    1. The size limit can only be above 2 MW for rooftops, parking canopies, or brownfield sites. 

  5. The 150% multiplier for Certified RECs goes into effect after January 1, 2025 

  6. New solar installed after July 1, 2024, will earn legacy MD SRECS until December 31, 2024, and then produce Certified SRECS thereafter for 15 years.

  7. For systems larger than 1MW in size workers must be paid the prevailing wage.

  8. Low Moderate Income (LMI) households at or below 150% of the average median income for the State of Maryland can apply for a grant of $750 per kW with a maximum grant of $7,500 per system.

We expect to hear by early May 2024 if the Governor signs the bill into law.

Certified MD SRECs can be used for 150% of the compliance value by electricity suppliers toward meeting the renewable portfolio standard. These SRECs will command a premium to regular MD SREC. Based on this 150% multiplier we calculate the implied SACP and premium to regular MD SRECs per year:

Energy Year

SACP

Certified “implied” SACP

Certified MD SREC premium estimate

2025

$55

$82.50

$27.50

2026

$45

$67.50

$22.50

2027

$35

$52.50

$17.50

2028

$32.50

$48.75

$16.25

2029

$25

$37.50

$12.50

2030 and later

$22.50

$33.75

$11.25

 

You can find a copy of the Maryland Solar Bill – HB1435 / SB0737 here:

 

https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2024RS/bills/sb/sb0783E.pdf

 

TAGS:
MarylandSRECSolarMaryland Certified

Maryland Geothermal REC Market

Flett Exchange operates a market for Maryland Geothermal RECs, or commonly called GRECs. Owners of certified geothermal facilities in Maryland – homes, businesses, schools, hospitals – sell their GRECs on Flett Exchange. Energy companies purchase GRECs on Flett Exchange to comply with Maryland’s Renewable Energy Portfolio. If energy companies do not purchase enough GRECs they have to submit a compliance payment to the state of Maryland. That compliance payment is $100 until 2025 and is reduced after that. See the compliance schedule decrease under “specifications”. 

Owners of geothermal facilities can register and sell their GRECs directly on Flett Exchange. Flett Exchange also offers full-service GREC management. For full-service managed clients Flett Exchange will register your system with the state of Maryland, register with the database that creates GRECS, and sell your GRECs along with all of our other GREC clients. Sellers benefit from the increased prices due to the large volume Flett Exchange transacts. 

The following are some of the main aspects of the MD GREC Market:

  1. Installation date: January 2023 cut-off. Prior to January 2023 MD geothermal facilities produced Class 1 RECs. January 2023 or later installations produce GRECs. 

  2. MD Class 1 REC price cap: $30

  3. MD GREC price cap: $100 -moving down to $65. See the schedule.

  4. Residential and non-residential geothermal facilities in Maryland qualify for GRECs differently. 

    1. Residential:

      1. installed in a residential home that is not owned by a business. The system must meet ENERGY STAR standards and not feed electricity back into the grid.

    2. Non-residential:

      1. At a commercial building; or

      2. At multi-family housing units that qualified as low- or moderate-income housing on the date the system was installed on the property; or

      3. At institutions that primarily serve low- or moderate-income individuals and families, including i) schools with a majority of students who are eligible for free and reduced prices meals; ii) hospitals with a majority of patients eligible for financial assistance or who are enrolled in Medicaid; and iii) other facilities that serve individuals and families where a majority of those is enrolled in Federal or State Safety Net Programs.

      4. A system with a 360,000 BTU capacity is eligible for geothermal renewable energy credits only if the Company installing the system provides for its employees:

        1. Family-sustaining wages;

        2. Employer-provided health care with affordable deductibles and co-pays;

        3. Career advancement training;

        4. Fair scheduling;

        5. Employer-paid workers’ compensation and unemployment insurance;

        6. A retirement plan;

        7. Paid time off; and

        8. The right to bargain collectively for wages and benefits

 

  1. Low income carve-out. Energy companies must procure 20% of the GREC obligation from low-income geothermal facilities. Low or Moderate Income (LMI) for GREC purposes is a household with an aggregate annual income that is below 120% of the area median income. The ability to qualify for the low-income tag on the GRECs may help in the future if the GREC market gets oversupplied because these may retain value longer. 

  2. New Geothermal facilities must register with the Maryland Public Service Commission and GATS. Flett Exchange will register for full-service GREC clients.

 

Register for either a do-it-yourself or a managed GREC account on Flett Exchange to take the first step to receive payments for your GRECs. 

 

TAGS:
MarylandPress ReleasesSRECResearchMaryland GREC

New Jersey Class 1 REC Eligibility for New Jersey Solar Facilities

All RECs registered in GATS from solar and wind facilities in PJM installed after January 1, 2003 can be used for New Jersey Class 1 compliance. Also, New Jersey Solar facilities that have outlived their SREC qualification of 15 years (or 10 years if the SRP registration for the solar project was filed on or before October 29, 2018) qualify as Class 1 RECs. These can be purchased by energy companies to satisfy their class 1 compliance. The life of the Class 1 rec is three energy years. Energy years run June to May. Compliance is done in the fall of each year.

How do I sell my Class 1 RECs?

If your New Jersey solar facility no longer qualifies for SRECs you can sell them as Class 1 RECs on Flett Exchange. It is the same process as you did with your SRECs except you sell them on the Class 1 market of Flett Exchange. If you have an account with Flett Exchange you can transfer them on GATS to the Flett Exchange account. Enter the Class 1 sell-now price published on the www.flettexchange.com homepage. We will process the trade, email you a confirmation and issue payment the next day. 

New Jersey Class 1 REC Value

The range for Class 1 RECs in New Jersey is $0 to $50. $50 is the Alternative Compliance Payment (ACP), or fine, that energy companies in New Jersey have to pay if they do not procure enough Class 1 RECs. The value for Class 1 RECs is $30 at the beginning of 2024 and is expected to move up to the $40 to $45 levels during the 2025 to 2030 timeframe. This rise is expected because New Jersey law requires energy companies to either produce more renewable energy or buy more Class 1 RECs in the coming years. 

TAGS:
New JerseyPress ReleasesSRECResearchSolarNJ Class 1

Washington DC Revises Solar Credit Laws

Washington D.C. has passed a law (B24-0950 / L24-0314) to change its renewable energy infrastructure requirements, making the District’s climate goals more aggressive than previously anticipated.  

 

With the number of installs in Washington DC doubling in the past few years, The Local Solar Expansion Act aims to re-balance the supply-demand fundamentals for the market. The bill will change the current solar carve-out from 10% of all delivered electricity to 15% by the year 2041. Additionally, the SACP (Solar Alternative Compliance Payment, or “penalty price”) is being reduced from $500.00 to $480.00 starting in 2024, and then gradually coming off $20.00 each year. This penalty price provides a theoretical ceiling for the cost of Solar Renewable Energy Credits (SRECs) in any given year. With that price being altered to a more conservative ramp-down, investor confidence will remain high and allow for further investment in the district. Although it is one of the smallest SREC markets in the country, the law’s passing allows Washington D.C.to remain one of the most premium. 


 

Year

Previous RPS

New RPS

Previous ACP

New ACP

2023

2.85%

3.00%

$500

$500

2024

3.15%

3.65%

$400

$480

2025

3.45%

4.30%

$400

$460

2026

3.75%

5.00%

$400

$440

2027

4.10%

5.65%

$400

$420

2028

4.50%

6.30%

$400

$400

2029

4.75%

7.00%

$300

$380

2030

5.00%

7.65%

$300

$360

2031

5.25%

8.30%

$300

$340

2032

5.50%

9.00%

$300

$320

2033

6.00%

9.65%

$300

$300

2034

6.50%

10.30%

$300

$300

2035

7.00%

11.00%

$300

$300

2036

7.50%

11.65%

$300

$300

2037

8.00%

12.30%

$300

$300

2038

8.50%

13.00%

$300

$300

2039

9.00%

13.65%

$300

$300

2040

9.50%

14.30%

$300

$300

2041

10.00%

15.00%

$300

$300


 

Flett Exchange will continue monitoring Washington, D.C. SREC markets and provide any additional updates as they are released.   

TAGS:
Washington DCResearch

Flett Exchange Launches VA SREC Market

Flett Exchange is now a market participant within the Virginia Solar Renewable Energy Credit (VA SREC) space, completing our first transactions as the new guidelines have become available.  We are now able to procure RECs and provide pricing for VA credits that have the appropriate accreditations on the GATS platform.  

 

While the specifics of the market rules and regulations are still coming to light, Virginia has emerged as a new and interesting space for solar development in the US.  Following the passing of the Virginia Clean Economy Act of 2020 (VCEA), both Dominion and Appalachian Power Company are now tasked with completing a Renewable Portfolio Standard on behalf of the customers they serve.  The VCEA mentions a few stipulations, but all RECs generated from 2017 and forward are eligible to be bought and sold for buyers to meet compliance. The amount of credits that both Dominion and APCo must procure to meet their compliance ramps up year over year with the hopes of incentivizing solar development within the state.  Both utilities must be 100% carbon free by the year 2050.

 

As it pertains to the residential customer, 1% of all RECs bought must come from facilities that are considered “Distributed Generation”, i.e. facilities that are less than 1MW in size.  This is designated by GATS by having a “D” applied to one’s Virginia State Certification Number.  

 

We have posted our current pricing for VA SRECS on our website under the “Virginia” tab. Like many other PJM markets, there is an Alternative Compliance Payment, or ACP, that places a “cap” on the value of each credit. The ACP is $75 for 2021 and increases 1% each year.  As we continue to monitor the amount of solar that is installed within Virginia, the price of spot market transactions will fluctuate with supply-demand fundamentals.  Any updated pricing will be reflected as such.

 

Flett Exchange has completed all  necessary set up to make sure that it provides liquidity and transparency to owners of the Virginia small distributed facilities.  In order to begin selling  through our exchange, register for an account on the Flett Exchange website.  We are happy to assist you with any questions you might have.

TAGS:
SRECVirginia

Maryland Bill Will Raise the Price Cap for MD SRECs

The Maryland legislature passed legislation that will raise the fine (Solar Alternative Compliance Payment) for power companies if they do not procure enough MD SRECs from solar owners. The current legislation sets a fine of $80 per SREC for 2021 and lowers each year to $20.35 by 2030. The bill raises that fine $15 to $20 each year. As of publication we are awaiting the Governor to sign it into law. The proposed fines are shown below.


The same bill also decreases the amount of solar that the energy companies have to procure. Taking into account the amount of solar installed in Maryland and the growth rate this should not have an effect on solar owner’s prices of their SRECs. The only way it will is if an unexpected amount of solar is installed in the next few years.


This is welcome news for solar owners in Maryland along with homeowners and businesses planning on installing a new solar array. The current SREC price caps were inhibiting solar development. We expect the rate of solar installations to increase in Maryland if this bill is passed.

 

Click here to view the full Amendments.

 

Energy Year

SACP

Proposed SACP

RPS % Solar

Proposed RPS % Solar

2019

$100

$100

5.5%

5.5%

2020

$100

$100

6.0%

6.0%

2021

$80

$80

7.5%

7.5%

2022

$60

$60

8.5%

5.5%

2023

$45

$60

9.5%

6.0%

2024

$40

$60

10.5%

6.5%

2025

$35

$55

11.5%

7.0%

2026

$30

$45

12.5%

8.0%

2027

$25

$35

13.5%

9.5%

2028

$25

$32.50

14.5%

11.0%

2029

$22.50

$25

14.5%

12.5%

2030

$20.35

$22.50

11.5%

14.5%


The following is the text for the Amendments to Maryland Senate bill 65 2021-2022 legislative session:
 

SB0065/773192/1                 

BY:     Economic Matters Committee   

 

AMENDMENTS TO SENATE BILL 65 

(Third Reading File Bill) 

AMENDMENT NO. 1

            On page 1, in line 2, strike “Qualifying” and substitute “Tier 2 Renewable

Sources, Qualifying”; in the same line, after “Biomass” insert “, and Compliance Fees”; in line 3, after the first “of” insert “altering the renewable energy portfolio standard for certain years; extending the eligibility of certain Tier 2 renewable sources for purposes of the renewable energy portfolio standard in certain years; altering the compliance fee for a shortfall from the required percentage of energy from certain Tier 1 renewable sources for the renewable energy portfolio standard in certain years;”; in line 7, after “Act;” insert “providing for the effective dates of this Act; making a conforming change;”; in line 11, strike “and” and substitute a comma; in the same line, after “(s)” insert “, and (t)”; in line 16, strike “and” and substitute “, 7–703(b)(16) through

 

(25),”; and in the same line, after “7–704(a)” insert “, and 7–705(b)(2)”.

AMENDMENT NO. 2

 

On page 1, after line 20, insert:

“Article – Public Utilities

 

7–701.

            (a) In this subtitle the following words have the meanings indicated.

            (t) “Tier 2 renewable source” means hydroelectric power other than pump                        storage generation.

 

7–703.

            (b) Except as provided in subsection (e) of this section, the renewable energy                     portfolio standard shall be as follows:

                        (16)     in 2021[,]:

                                    (I)       30.8% from Tier 1 renewable sources, including:

                                    [(i)] 1.             at least 7.5% derived from solar energy; and

                                    [(ii)] 2.            an amount set by the Commission under § 7–704.2(a)                                 of this subtitle derived from offshore wind energy; AND

                                    (II)      2.5% FROM TIER 2 RENEWABLE SOURCES;

                        (17)     in 2022[, 33.1%]: 

                                    (I)        30.1% from Tier 1 renewable sources, including:

                                    [(i)] 1.             at least [8.5%] 5.5% derived from solar energy; and

                                    [(ii)] 2.            an amount set by the Commission under § 7–704.2(a)

of this subtitle derived from offshore wind energy; AND

                                    (II)      2.5% FROM TIER 2 RENEWABLE SOURCES;

                        (18)     in 2023[, 35.4%]: 

                                    (I)        31.9% from Tier 1 renewable sources, including:

                                    [(i)] 1.             at least [9.5%] 6% derived from solar energy; and

                                    [(ii)] 2.            an amount set by the Commission under § 7–704.2(a)

                                    of this subtitle derived from offshore wind energy; AND

                                    (II)      2.5% FROM TIER 2 RENEWABLE SOURCES;

                        (19)     in 2024[, 37.7%]: 

                                    (I)        33.7% from Tier 1 renewable sources, including:

                                    [(i)] 1.             at least [10.5%] 6.5% derived from solar energy; and

                                    [(ii)] 2.            an amount set by the Commission under § 7–704.2(a)

                                    of this subtitle derived from offshore wind energy; AND

                                    (II)      2.5% FROM TIER 2 RENEWABLE SOURCES;

                        (20)     in 2025[, 40%]: 

                                    (I)        35.5% from Tier 1 renewable sources, including:

                                    [(i)] 1.             at least [11.5%] 7% derived from solar energy; and

                                    [(ii)] 2.            an amount set by the Commission under § 7–704.2(a)

            of this subtitle, not to exceed 10%, derived from offshore wind energy; AND

                                    (II)      2.5% FROM TIER 2 RENEWABLE SOURCES;

                        (21)     in 2026[, 42.5%]: 

                                    (I)        38% from Tier 1 renewable sources, including:

                                    [(i)] 1.             at least [12.5%] 8% derived from solar energy; and

                                    [(ii)] 2.            an amount set by the Commission under § 7–704.2(a)

of this subtitle derived from offshore wind energy, including at least 400 megawatts of Round 2 offshore wind projects; AND

                                    (II)      2.5% FROM TIER 2 RENEWABLE SOURCES;

                        (22)     in 2027[, 45.5%]: 

                                    (I)        41.5% from Tier 1 renewable sources, including:

                                    [(i)] 1.             at least [13.5%] 9.5% derived from solar energy; and

                                    [(ii)] 2. an amount set by the Commission under § 7–704.2(a) of this subtitle derived from offshore wind energy, including at least 400 megawatts of Round 2 offshore wind projects; AND

                                    (II)      2.5% FROM TIER 2 RENEWABLE SOURCES;

                        (23)     in 2028[, 47.5%]: 

                                    (I)        43% from Tier 1 renewable sources, including:

                                    [(i)] 1.             at least [14.5%] 11% derived from solar energy; and

                                    [(ii)] 2.            an amount set by the Commission under § 7–704.2(a)

of this subtitle derived from offshore wind energy, including at least 800 megawatts of Round 2 offshore wind projects; AND

                                    (II)      2.5% FROM TIER 2 RENEWABLE SOURCES;

                        (24)     in 2029[, 49.5%]: 

                                    (I)        47.5% from Tier 1 renewable sources, including:

                                    [(i)] 1.             at least [14.5%] 12.5% derived from solar energy; and

                                    [(ii)] 2. an amount set by the Commission under § 7–704.2(a) of this subtitle derived from offshore wind energy, including at least 800 megawatts of Round 2 offshore wind projects; and

                                    (II)      2.5% FROM TIER 2 RENEWABLE SOURCES; AND

                        (25)     in 2030 and later[,]: 

                                    (I) 50% from Tier 1 renewable sources, including:

                                    [(i)] 1.             at least 14.5% derived from solar energy; and

                                    [(ii)] 2.            an amount set by the Commission under § 7–704.2(a)

of this subtitle derived from offshore wind energy, including at least 1,200 megawatts of Round 2 offshore wind projects; AND

                                    (II)      2.5% FROM TIER 2 RENEWABLE SOURCES

 

7–705.

 (b) (2) If an electricity supplier fails to comply with the renewable energy portfolio standard for the applicable year, the electricity supplier shall pay into the Maryland Strategic Energy Investment Fund established under § 9–20B–05 of the State Government Article:

 

(i) except as provided in item (ii) of this paragraph, a compliance fee of:

1. the following amounts for each kilowatt–hour of shortfall from required Tier 1 renewable sources other than the shortfall from the required Tier 1 renewable sources that is to be derived from solar energy:

A.        4 cents through 2016;

B.        3.75 cents in 2017 and 2018;

C.        3 cents in 2019 through 2023;

D.        2.75 cents in 2024;

E.        2.5 cents in 2025;

F.        2.475 cents in 2026;

G.        2.45 cents in 2027;

H.        2.25 cents in 2028 and 2029; and

I.         2.235 cents in 2030 and later;

 

2. the following amounts for each kilowatt–hour of shortfall from required Tier 1 renewable sources that is to be derived from solar energy:

A.        45 cents in 2008;

B.        40 cents in 2009 through 2014;

C.        35 cents in 2015 and 2016;

D.        19.5 cents in 2017;

E.        17.5 cents in 2018;

F.        10 cents in 2019;

G.        10 cents in 2020;

H.        8 cents in 2021;

I.         6 cents in 2022;

J.         [4.5] 6 cents in 2023;

K.        [4] 6 cents in 2024;

L.        [3.5] 5.5 cents in 2025;

M.       [3] 4.5 cents in 2026;

N.        [2.5] 3.5 cents in 2027 [and 2028];

O.        [2.25] 3.25 cents in [2029] 2028; [and]

P.        [2.235] 2.5 cents in [2030 and later] 2029; and

Q.        2.25 CENTS IN 2030 AND LATER; AND

 

3. 1.5 cents for each kilowatt–hour of shortfall from required Tier 2 renewable sources; or

                                    (ii)       for industrial process load:

                                    1.         for each kilowatt–hour of shortfall from required Tier

1 renewable sources, a compliance fee of:

A.        0.8 cents in 2006, 2007, and 2008;

B.        0.5 cents in 2009 and 2010;

C.        0.4 cents in 2011 and 2012;

D.        0.3 cents in 2013 and 2014;

E.        0.25 cents in 2015 and 2016; and

F.        except as provided in paragraph (3) of this subsection,

0.2 cents in 2017 and later; and

                                                2.         nothing for any shortfall from required Tier 2 renewable sources.

 

 SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That the Laws of Maryland read as follows:”.

 On page 4, in line 15, strike “through 2020”; in line 18, strike “2.” and substitute “3.”; in line 20, strike “3.” and substitute “4.”; in the same line, after “That” insert “Section 2 of”; and after line 22, insert:

            “SECTION 5. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That, except as provided in

Section 4 of this Act, this Act shall take effect June 1, 2020.”.

DISCLAIMER: Maryland SREC prices are volatile. Buyers and sellers of SRECs must do their own research. The above projections are subject to change as market dynamics change.

TAGS:
MarylandSRECSolar

Will the New TREC Affect the Prices of My SRECs?

NO.

All new solar installed after April 30, 2020in New Jersey will qualify for a TREC instead of an SREC. If you already have solar you still generate SRECs. TRECs have no correlation to the value of your SRECs. 

New Jersey electricity retailers are required to purchase a certain number of SRECs each year. The number that they buy is a preset percentage set by a schedule. It is determined by law. 

If you installed solar prior to November of 2018 you get 15 years of SRECs. If you installed between November 2018 and April 2020 you qualify for 10 years of SRECS. If you install after April 30, 2020 you get TRECs. Simple.

The new TRECs ensure that new solar installations do not compete with you selling your SRECs. 

You do have to worry about the decrease in electricity demand due to Covid-19 shut-downs in regard to your SREC prices. If shut-downs extend for a prolonged period of time, and if economic activity does not pick up to previous levels, energy companies will not be forced to buy as many SRECs from you. This may lead to an oversupply of SRECs and subsequent price-drop.

We suggest to always sell your SRECs on a consistent basis, especially when SREC prices are 90% of their potential which they are now.

TAGS:
New Jersey

New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Announces fixed $152 for TREC

The New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (BPU) announced on March 9, 2020 that the TREC will be a fixed $152 for 15 years. Prior it was set at $65 for the first three energy years and rising to $189 for the remaining 12 years.
 
The tiered SREC was a result of the cost cap implemented in the Clean Energy Act of 2018 limiting ratepayer costs to 9% in energy years 2019 to 2021 and then decreasing to 7% thereafter. 
 
On January 21, 2020 Governor Murphy signed into law amendments to the Clean Energy Act shifting the ratepayers savings potentially saved under the 9% to make up for modeled overspending when the 7% cap goes into effect in energy year 2022. The Board of Public Utilities has approved a fixed rate $152 based on the passage of the legislation and BPU staff recommendations. The amount of the $152 that a project actually receives is based on the following types of solar installations:
 
Landfill, Brownfield, Historic Fill = $152
Grid supply subsection (r) rooftop = $152
Net metered rooftop and carport = $152
Community Solar= $129.20 (85% of TREC value)
Ground mount (subsection r) = $91.20 (60% of TREC value)
Residential net-metered ground mount = $91.20 (60% of TREC value)
Residential net-metered rooftop and carport =  $91.20 (60% of TREC value)
Net-metered non-residential ground mount=  $91.20 (60% of TREC value)
 
 
Residential solar installers are especially pleased by this development. The new TREC program greatly decreases incentives for homeowners to invest in solar in New Jersey and the tiered incentive in the TREC would have made it especially hard for residential solar sales. 
 

DISCLAIMER: New Jersey SREC prices are volatile. Buyers and sellers of SRECs must do their own research. The above projections are subject to change as market dynamics change.

TAGS:
New JerseyResearchSolar

New Jersey Senate Bill 4275

This is a bill, not yet a law.

This bill would allow the Board of Public Utilities (BPU) to increase the cost to customers of the State’s Class I renewable energy requirement during energy years 2022 through 2024 above the current limit of seven percent of the total paid for electricity by all customers in the State, under certain conditions.

Under the bill, the BPU could only make this increase if the cost of the Class I renewable energy requirement is less than nine percent of total energy costs during energy years 2019 through 2021 (the limit set by current law). In addition, the total amount paid by customers during energy years 2019 through 2024 could not exceed the sum of: (1) nine percent of total energy costs during energy years 2019 through 2021; and (2) seven percent of total energy costs during energy years 2022 through 2024, i.e. the maximum amount allowed by current law over that six-year period.

“Energy year” means the 12-month period from June 1st through May 31st, numbered according to the calendar year in which it ends.

 

https://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2018/Bills/S4500/4275_I1.HTM

 

SENATE, No. 4275

 

STATE OF NEW JERSEY

218th LEGISLATURE

 

INTRODUCED DECEMBER 5, 2019

 

 

 

Sponsored by:

Senator  BOB SMITH

District 17 (Middlesex and Somerset)

 

 

 

 

SYNOPSIS

     Allows BPU to increase cost to customers of Class I renewable energy requirement for energy years 2022 through 2024, under certain conditions.

 

CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT

     As introduced.

 

 

An Act concerning the cost to customers of Class I renewable energy and amending P.L.1999, c.23.

 

     Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

 

      1.   Section 38 of P.L.1999, c.23 (C.48:3-87) is amended to read as follows:

      38.    a.  The board shall require an electric power supplier or basic generation service provider to disclose on a customer's bill or on customer contracts or marketing materials, a uniform, common set of information about the environmental characteristics of the energy purchased by the customer, including, but not limited to:

     (1)   Its fuel mix, including categories for oil, gas, nuclear, coal, solar, hydroelectric, wind and biomass, or a regional average determined by the board;

     (2)   Its emissions, in pounds per megawatt hour, of sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide, oxides of nitrogen, and any other pollutant that the board may determine to pose an environmental or health hazard, or an emissions default to be determined by the board; and

     (3)   Any discrete emission reduction retired pursuant to rules and regulations adopted pursuant to P.L.1995, c.188.

      b.   Notwithstanding any provisions of the "Administrative Procedure Act," P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.) to the contrary, the board shall initiate a proceeding and shall adopt, in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection, after notice and opportunity for public comment and public hearing, interim standards to implement this disclosure requirement, including, but not limited to:

     (1)   A methodology for disclosure of emissions based on output pounds per megawatt hour;

     (2)   Benchmarks for all suppliers and basic generation service providers to use in disclosing emissions that will enable consumers to perform a meaningful comparison with a supplier's or basic generation service provider's emission levels; and

     (3)   A uniform emissions disclosure format that is graphic in nature and easily understandable by consumers.  The board shall periodically review the disclosure requirements to determine if revisions to the environmental disclosure system as implemented are necessary.

     Such standards shall be effective as regulations immediately upon filing with the Office of Administrative Law and shall be effective for a period not to exceed 18 months, and may, thereafter, be amended, adopted or readopted by the board in accordance with the provisions of the "Administrative Procedure Act."

      c.    (1)   The board may adopt, in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection, after notice and opportunity for public comment, an emissions portfolio standard applicable to all electric power suppliers and basic generation service providers, upon a finding that:

     (a)   The standard is necessary as part of a plan to enable the State to meet federal Clean Air Act or State ambient air quality standards; and

     (b)   Actions at the regional or federal level cannot reasonably be expected to achieve the compliance with the federal standards.

     (2)   By July 1, 2009, the board shall adopt, pursuant to the "Administrative Procedure Act," P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.), a greenhouse gas emissions portfolio standard to mitigate leakage or another regulatory mechanism to mitigate leakage applicable to all electric power suppliers and basic generation service providers that provide electricity to customers within the State.  The greenhouse gas emissions portfolio standard or any other regulatory mechanism to mitigate leakage shall:

     (a)   Allow a transition period, either before or after the effective date of the regulation to mitigate leakage, for a basic generation service provider or electric power supplier to either meet the emissions portfolio standard or other regulatory mechanism to mitigate leakage, or to transfer any customer to a basic generation service provider or electric power supplier that meets the emissions portfolio standard or other regulatory mechanism to mitigate leakage.  If the transition period allowed pursuant to this subparagraph occurs after the implementation of an emissions portfolio standard or other regulatory mechanism to mitigate leakage, the transition period shall be no longer than three years; and

     (b)   Exempt the provision of basic generation service pursuant to a basic generation service purchase and sale agreement effective prior to the date of the regulation.

     Unless the Attorney General or the Attorney General's designee determines that a greenhouse gas emissions portfolio standard would unconstitutionally burden interstate commerce or would be preempted by federal law, the adoption by the board of an electric energy efficiency portfolio standard pursuant to subsection g. of this section, a gas energy efficiency portfolio standard pursuant to subsection h. of this section, or any other enhanced energy efficiency policies to mitigate leakage shall not be considered sufficient to fulfill the requirement of this subsection for the adoption of a greenhouse gas emissions portfolio standard or any other regulatory mechanism to mitigate leakage.

      d.   Notwithstanding any provisions of the "Administrative Procedure Act," P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.) to the contrary, the board shall initiate a proceeding and shall adopt, after notice, provision of the opportunity for comment, and public hearing, renewable energy portfolio standards that shall require:

     (1)   that two and one-half percent of the kilowatt hours sold in this State by each electric power supplier and each basic generation service provider be from Class II renewable energy sources;

     (2)   beginning on January 1, 2020, that  21 percent of the kilowatt hours sold in this State by each electric power supplier and each basic generation service provider be from Class I renewable energy sources.  The board shall increase the required percentage for Class I renewable energy sources so that by January 1, 2025, 35 percent of the kilowatt hours sold in this State by each electric power supplier and each basic generation service provider shall be from Class I renewable energy sources, and by January 1, 2030, 50 percent of the kilowatt hours sold in this State by each electric power supplier and each basic generation service provider shall be from Class I renewable energy sources.  Notwithstanding the requirements of this subsection, the board shall ensure that the cost to customers of the Class I renewable energy requirement imposed pursuant to this subsection shall not exceed nine percent of the total paid for electricity by all customers in the State for energy year 2019, energy year 2020, and energy year 2021, respectively, and shall not exceed seven percent of the total paid for electricity by all customers in the State in any energy year thereafter ; provided that, if in energy years 2019 through 2021 the cost to customers of the Class I renewable energy requirement is less than nine percent of the total paid for electricity by all customers in the State, the board may increase the cost to customers of the Class I renewable energy requirement in energy years 2022 through 2024 to a rate greater than seven percent, as long as the total costs to customers for energy years 2019 through 2024 does not exceed the sum of nine percent of the total paid for electricity by all customers in the State in energy years 2019 through 2021 and seven percent of the total paid for electricity by all customers in the State in energy years 2022 through 2024 .  In calculating the cost to customers of the Class I renewable energy requirement imposed pursuant to this subsection, the board shall not include the costs of the offshore wind energy certificate program established pursuant to paragraph (4) of this subsection.  The board shall take any steps necessary to prevent the exceedance of the cap on the cost to customers including, but not limited to, adjusting the Class I renewable energy requirement.

     An electric power supplier or basic generation service provider may satisfy the requirements of this subsection by participating in a renewable energy trading program approved by the board in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection;

     (3)   that the board establish a multi-year schedule, applicable to each electric power supplier or basic generation service provider in this State, beginning with the one-year period commencing on June 1, 2010, and continuing for each subsequent one-year period up to and including, the one-year period commencing on June 1, 2033, that requires the following number or percentage, as the case may be, of kilowatt-hours sold in this State by each electric power supplier and each basic generation service provider to be from solar electric power generators connected to the distribution system in this State:

     EY 2011                 306 Gigawatthours (Gwhrs)

     EY 2012                 442 Gwhrs

     EY 2013                 596 Gwhrs

     EY 2014                 2.050%

     EY 2015                 2.450%

     EY 2016                 2.750%

     EY 2017                 3.000%

     EY 2018                 3.200%

     EY 2019                 4.300%

     EY 2020                 4.900%

     EY 2021                 5.100%

     EY 2022                 5.100%

     EY 2023                 5.100%

     EY 2024                 4.900%

     EY 2025                 4.800%

     EY 2026                 4.500%

     EY 2027                 4.350%

     EY 2028                 3.740%

     EY 2029                 3.070%

     EY 2030                 2.210%

     EY 2031                 1.580%

     EY 2032                 1.400%

     EY 2033                 1.100%

     No later than 180 days after the date of enactment of P.L.2018, c.17 (C.48:3-87.8 et al.), the board shall adopt rules and regulations to close the SREC program to new applications upon the attainment of 5.1 percent of the kilowatt-hours sold in the State by each electric power supplier and each basic generation provider from solar electric power generators connected to the distribution system.  The board shall continue to consider any application filed before the date of enactment of P.L.2018, c.17 (C.48:3-87.8 et al.).  The board shall provide for an orderly and transparent mechanism that will result in the closing of the existing SREC program on a date certain but no later than June 1, 2021.

     No later than 24 months after the date of enactment of P.L.2018, c.17 (C.48:3-87.8 et al.), the board shall complete a study that evaluates how to modify or replace the SREC program to encourage the continued efficient and orderly development of solar renewable energy generating sources throughout the State.  The board shall submit the written report thereon to the Governor and, pursuant to section 2 of P.L.1991, c.164 (C.52:14-19.1), to the Legislature.  The board shall consult with public utilities, industry experts, regional grid operators, solar power providers and financiers, and other State agencies to determine whether the board can modify the SREC program such that the program will:

     -      continually reduce, where feasible, the cost of achieving the solar energy goals set forth in this subsection;

     -      provide an orderly transition from the SREC program to a new or modified program;

     -      develop megawatt targets for grid connected and distribution systems, including residential and small commercial rooftop systems, community solar systems, and large scale behind the meter systems, as a share of the overall solar energy requirement, which targets the board may modify periodically based on the cost, feasibility, or social impacts of different types of projects;

     -      establish and update market-based maximum incentive payment caps periodically for each of the above categories of solar electric power generation facilities;

     -      encourage and facilitate market-based cost recovery through long-term contracts and energy market sales; and

     -      where cost recovery is needed for any portion of an efficient solar electric power generation facility when costs are not recoverable through wholesale market sales and direct payments from customers, utilize competitive processes such as competitive procurement and long-term contracts where possible to ensure such recovery, without exceeding the maximum incentive payment cap for that category of facility.

     The board shall approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove any application for designation as connected to the distribution system of a solar electric power generation facility filed with the board after the date of enactment of P.L.2018, c.17 (C.48:3-87.8 et al.), no more than 90 days after receipt by the board of a completed application.  For any such application for a project greater than 25 kilowatts, the board shall require the applicant to post a notice escrow with the board in an amount of $40 per kilowatt of DC nameplate capacity of the facility, not to exceed $40,000.  The notice escrow amount shall be reimbursed to the applicant in full upon either denial of the application by the board or upon commencement of commercial operation of the solar electric power generation facility.  The escrow amount shall be forfeited to the State if the facility is designated as connected to the distribution system pursuant to this subsection but does not commence commercial operation within two years following the date of the designation by the board.

     For all applications for designation as connected to the distribution system of a solar electric power generation facility filed with the board after the date of enactment of P.L.2018, c.17 (C.48:3-87.8 et al.), the SREC term shall be 10 years.

     (a)   The board shall determine an appropriate period of no less than 120 days following the end of an energy year prior to which a provider or supplier must demonstrate compliance for that energy year with the annual renewable portfolio standard;

     (b)   No more than 24 months following the date of enactment of P.L.2012, c.24, the board shall complete a proceeding to investigate approaches to mitigate solar development volatility and prepare and submit, pursuant to section 2 of P.L.1991, c.164 (C.52:14-19.1), a report to the Legislature, detailing its findings and recommendations.  As part of the proceeding, the board shall evaluate other techniques used nationally and internationally;

     (c)   The solar renewable portfolio standards requirements in this paragraph shall exempt those existing supply contracts which are effective prior to the date of enactment of P.L.2018, c.17 (C.48:3-87.8 et al.) from any increase beyond the number of SRECs mandated by the solar renewable energy portfolio standards requirements that were in effect on the date that the providers executed their existing supply contracts.  This limited exemption for providers' existing supply contracts shall not be construed to lower the Statewide solar sourcing requirements set forth in this paragraph. Such incremental requirements that would have otherwise been imposed on exempt providers shall be distributed over the providers not subject to the existing supply contract exemption until such time as existing supply contracts expire and all providers are subject to the new requirement in a manner that is competitively neutral among all providers and suppliers.  Notwithstanding any rule or regulation to the contrary, the board shall recognize these new solar purchase obligations as a change required by operation of law and implement the provisions of this subsection in a manner so as to prevent any subsidies between suppliers and providers and to promote competition in the electricity supply industry.

     An electric power supplier or basic generation service provider may satisfy the requirements of this subsection by participating in a renewable energy trading program approved by the board in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection, or compliance with the requirements of this subsection may be demonstrated to the board by suppliers or providers through the purchase of SRECs.

     The renewable energy portfolio standards adopted by the board pursuant to paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection shall be effective as regulations immediately upon filing with the Office of Administrative Law and shall be effective for a period not to exceed 18 months, and may, thereafter, be amended, adopted or readopted by the board in accordance with the provisions of the "Administrative Procedure Act."

     The renewable energy portfolio standards adopted by the board pursuant to this paragraph shall be effective as regulations immediately upon filing with the Office of Administrative Law and shall be effective for a period not to exceed 30 months after such filing, and shall, thereafter, be amended, adopted or readopted by the board in accordance with the "Administrative Procedure Act"; and

     (4)   within 180 days after the date of enactment of P.L.2010, c.57 (C.48:3-87.1 et al.), that the board establish an offshore wind renewable energy certificate program to require that a percentage of the kilowatt hours sold in this State by each electric power supplier and each basic generation service provider be from offshore wind energy in order to support at least 3,500 megawatts of generation from qualified offshore wind projects.

     The percentage established by the board pursuant to this paragraph shall serve as an offset to the renewable energy portfolio standard established pursuant to paragraph (2) of this subsection and shall reduce the corresponding Class I renewable energy requirement.

     The percentage established by the board pursuant to this paragraph shall reflect the projected OREC production of each qualified offshore wind project, approved by the board pursuant to section 3 of P.L.2010, c.57 (C.48:3-87.1), for 20 years from the commercial operation start date of the qualified offshore wind project which production projection and OREC purchase requirement, once approved by the board, shall not be subject to reduction.

     An electric power supplier or basic generation service provider shall comply with the OREC program established pursuant to this paragraph through the purchase of offshore wind renewable energy certificates at a price and for the time period required by the board.  In the event there are insufficient offshore wind renewable energy certificates available, the electric power supplier or basic generation service provider shall pay an offshore wind alternative compliance payment established by the board.  Any offshore wind alternative compliance payments collected shall be refunded directly to the ratepayers by the electric public utilities.

     The rules established by the board pursuant to this paragraph shall be effective as regulations immediately upon filing with the Office of Administrative Law and shall be effective for a period not to exceed 18 months, and may, thereafter, be amended, adopted or readopted by the board in accordance with the provisions of the "Administrative Procedure Act," P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.).

     e.     Notwithstanding any provisions of the "Administrative Procedure Act," P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.) to the contrary, the board shall initiate a proceeding and shall adopt, after notice, provision of the opportunity for comment, and public hearing:

     (1)   net metering standards for electric power suppliers and basic generation service providers.  The standards shall require electric power suppliers and basic generation service providers to offer net metering at non-discriminatory rates to industrial, large commercial, residential and small commercial customers, as those customers are classified or defined by the board, that generate electricity, on the customer's side of the meter, using a Class I renewable energy source, for the net amount of electricity supplied by the electric power supplier or basic generation service provider over an annualized period.  Systems of any sized capacity, as measured in watts, are eligible for net metering.  If the amount of electricity generated by the customer-generator, plus any kilowatt hour credits held over from the previous billing periods, exceeds the electricity supplied by the electric power supplier or basic generation service provider, then the electric power supplier or basic generation service provider, as the case may be, shall credit the customer-generator for the excess kilowatt hours until the end of the annualized period at which point the customer-generator will be compensated for any remaining credits or, if the customer-generator chooses, credit the customer-generator on a real-time basis, at the electric power supplier's or basic generation service provider's avoided cost of wholesale power or the PJM electric power pool's real-time locational marginal pricing rate, adjusted for losses, for the respective zone in the PJM electric power pool.  Alternatively, the customer-generator may execute a bilateral agreement with an electric power supplier or basic generation service provider for the sale and purchase of the customer-generator's excess generation. The customer-generator may be credited on a real-time basis, so long as the customer-generator follows applicable rules prescribed by the PJM electric power pool for its capacity requirements for the net amount of electricity supplied by the electric power supplier or basic generation service provider.  The board may authorize an electric power supplier or basic generation service provider to cease offering net metering to customers that are not already net metered whenever the total rated generating capacity owned and operated by net metering customer-generators Statewide equals 5.8 percent of the total annual kilowatt-hours sold in this State by each electric power supplier and each basic generation service provider during the prior one-year period;

     (2)   safety and power quality interconnection standards for Class I renewable energy source systems used by a customer-generator that shall be eligible for net metering.

     Such standards or rules shall take into consideration the goals of the New Jersey Energy Master Plan, applicable industry standards, and the standards of other states and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. The board shall allow electric public utilities to recover the costs of any new net meters, upgraded net meters, system reinforcements or upgrades, and interconnection costs through either their regulated rates or from the net metering customer-generator;

     (3)   credit or other incentive rules for generators using Class I renewable energy generation systems that connect to New Jersey's electric public utilities' distribution system but who do not net meter; and

     (4)   net metering aggregation standards to require electric public utilities to provide net metering aggregation to single electric public utility customers that operate a solar electric power generation system installed at one of the customer's facilities or on property owned by the customer, provided that any such customer is a State entity, school district, county, county agency, county authority, municipality, municipal agency, or municipal authority.  The standards shall provide that, in order to qualify for net metering aggregation, the customer must operate a solar electric power generation system using a net metering billing account, which system is located on property owned by the customer, provided that: (a) the property is not land that has been actively devoted to agricultural or horticultural use and that is valued, assessed, and taxed pursuant to the "Farmland Assessment Act of 1964," P.L.1964, c.48 (C.54:4-23.1 et seq.) at any time within the 10-year period prior to the effective date of P.L.2012, c.24, provided, however, that the municipal planning board of a municipality in which a solar electric power generation system is located may waive the requirement of this subparagraph (a), (b) the system is not an on-site generation facility, (c) all of the facilities of the single customer combined for the purpose of net metering aggregation are facilities owned or operated by the single customer and are located within its territorial jurisdiction except that all of the facilities of a State entity engaged in net metering aggregation shall be located within five miles of one another, and (d) all of those facilities are within the service territory of a single electric public utility and are all served by the same basic generation service provider or by the same electric power supplier.  The standards shall provide that in order to qualify for net metering aggregation, the customer's solar electric power generation system shall be sized so that its annual generation does not exceed the combined metered annual energy usage of the qualified customer facilities, and the qualified customer facilities shall all be in the same customer rate class under the applicable electric public utility tariff.  For the customer's facility or property on which the solar electric generation system is installed, the electricity generated from the customer's solar electric generation system shall be accounted for pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of this subsection to provide that the electricity generated in excess of the electricity supplied by the electric power supplier or the basic generation service provider, as the case may be, for the customer's facility on which the solar electric generation system is installed, over the annualized period, is credited at the electric power supplier's or the basic generation service provider's avoided cost of wholesale power or the PJM electric power pool real-time locational marginal pricing rate.  All electricity used by the customer's qualified facilities, with the exception of the facility or property on which the solar electric power generation system is installed, shall be billed at the full retail rate pursuant to the electric public utility tariff applicable to the customer class of the customer using the electricity.  A customer may contract with a third party to operate a solar electric power generation system, for the purpose of net metering aggregation.  Any contractual relationship entered into for operation of a solar electric power generation system related to net metering aggregation shall include contractual protections that provide for adequate performance and provision for construction and operation for the term of the contract, including any appropriate bonding or escrow requirements.  Any incremental cost to an electric public utility for net metering aggregation shall be fully and timely recovered in a manner to be determined by the board.  The board shall adopt net metering aggregation standards within 270 days after the effective date of P.L.2012, c.24.

     Such rules shall require the board or its designee to issue a credit or other incentive to those generators that do not use a net meter but otherwise generate electricity derived from a Class I renewable energy source and to issue an enhanced credit or other incentive, including, but not limited to, a solar renewable energy credit, to those generators that generate electricity derived from solar technologies.

     Such standards or rules shall be effective as regulations immediately upon filing with the Office of Administrative Law and shall be effective for a period not to exceed 18 months, and may, thereafter, be amended, adopted or readopted by the board in accordance with the provisions of the "Administrative Procedure Act."

     f.     The board may assess, by written order and after notice and opportunity for comment, a separate fee to cover the cost of implementing and overseeing an emission disclosure system or emission portfolio standard, which fee shall be assessed based on an electric power supplier's or basic generation service provider's share of the retail electricity supply market.  The board shall not impose a fee for the cost of implementing and overseeing a greenhouse gas emissions portfolio standard adopted pursuant to paragraph (2) of subsection c. of this section.

     g.    The board shall adopt, pursuant to the "Administrative Procedure Act," P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.), an electric energy efficiency  program in order to ensure investment in cost-effective energy efficiency measures, ensure universal access to energy efficiency measures, and serve the needs of low-income communities that shall require each electric public utility to implement energy efficiency measures that reduce electricity usage in the State  pursuant to section 3 of P.L.2018, c.17 (C.48:3-87.9).  Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prevent an electric public utility from meeting the requirements of this subsection by contracting with another entity for the performance of the requirements.

     h.    The board shall adopt, pursuant to the "Administrative Procedure Act," P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.), a gas energy efficiency program in order to ensure investment in cost-effective energy efficiency measures, ensure universal access to energy efficiency measures, and serve the needs of low-income communities that shall require each gas public utility to implement energy efficiency measures that reduce natural gas usage in the State pursuant to section 3 of P.L.2018, c.17 (C.48:3-87.9).  Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prevent a gas public utility from meeting the requirements of this subsection by contracting with another entity for the performance of the requirements.

     i.     After the board establishes a schedule of solar kilowatt-hour sale or purchase requirements pursuant to paragraph (3) of subsection d. of this section, the board may initiate subsequent proceedings and adopt, after appropriate notice and opportunity for public comment and public hearing, increased minimum solar kilowatt-hour sale or purchase requirements, provided that the board shall not reduce previously established minimum solar kilowatt-hour sale or purchase requirements, or otherwise impose constraints that reduce the requirements by any means.

     j.     The board shall determine an appropriate level of solar alternative compliance payment, and permit each supplier or provider to submit an SACP to comply with the solar electric generation requirements of paragraph (3) of subsection d. of this section.  The value of the SACP for each Energy Year, for Energy Years 2014 through 2033 per megawatt hour from solar electric generation required pursuant to this section, shall be:

     EY 2014     $339

     EY 2015     $331

     EY 2016     $323

     EY 2017     $315

     EY 2018     $308

     EY 2019     $268

     EY 2020     $258

     EY 2021     $248

     EY 2022     $238

     EY 2023     $228

     EY 2024     $218

     EY 2025     $208

     EY 2026     $198

     EY 2027     $188

     EY 2028     $178

     EY 2029     $168

     EY 2030     $158

     EY 2031     $148

     EY 2032     $138

     EY 2033     $128.

     The board may initiate subsequent proceedings and adopt, after appropriate notice and opportunity for public comment and public hearing, an increase in solar alternative compliance payments, provided that the board shall not reduce previously established levels of solar alternative compliance payments, nor shall the board provide relief from the obligation of payment of the SACP by the electric power suppliers or basic generation service providers in any form.  Any SACP payments collected shall be refunded directly to the ratepayers by the electric public utilities.

      k.   The board may allow electric public utilities to offer long-term contracts through a competitive process, direct electric public utility investment and other means of financing, including but not limited to loans, for the purchase of SRECs and the resale of SRECs to suppliers or providers or others, provided that after such contracts have been approved by the board, the board's approvals shall not be modified by subsequent board orders.  If the board allows the offering of contracts pursuant to this subsection, the board may establish a process, after hearing, and opportunity for public comment, to provide that a designated segment of the contracts approved pursuant to this subsection shall be contracts involving solar electric power generation facility projects with a capacity of up to 250 kilowatts.

      l.    The board shall implement its responsibilities under the provisions of this section in such a manner as to:

     (1)   place greater reliance on competitive markets, with the explicit goal of encouraging and ensuring the emergence of new entrants that can foster innovations and price competition;

     (2)   maintain adequate regulatory authority over non-competitive public utility services;

     (3)   consider alternative forms of regulation in order to address changes in the technology and structure of electric public utilities;

     (4)   promote energy efficiency and Class I renewable energy market development, taking into consideration environmental benefits and market barriers;

     (5)   make energy services more affordable for low and moderate income customers;

     (6)   attempt to transform the renewable energy market into one that can move forward without subsidies from the State or public utilities;

     (7)   achieve the goals put forth under the renewable energy portfolio standards;

     (8)   promote the lowest cost to ratepayers; and

     (9)   allow all market segments to participate.

      m.  The board shall ensure the availability of financial incentives under its jurisdiction, including, but not limited to, long-term contracts, loans, SRECs, or other financial support, to ensure market diversity, competition, and appropriate coverage across all ratepayer segments, including, but not limited to, residential, commercial, industrial, non-profit, farms, schools, and public entity customers.

      n.   For projects which are owned, or directly invested in, by a public utility pursuant to section 13 of P.L.2007, c.340 (C.48:3-98.1), the board shall determine the number of SRECs with which such projects shall be credited; and in determining such number the board shall ensure that the market for SRECs does not detrimentally affect the development of non-utility solar projects and shall consider how its determination may impact the ratepayers.

      o.   The board, in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection, electric public utilities, the Division of Rate Counsel in, but not of, the Department of the Treasury, affected members of the solar energy industry, and relevant stakeholders, shall periodically consider increasing the renewable energy portfolio standards beyond the minimum amounts set forth in subsection d. of this section, taking into account the cost impacts and public benefits of such increases including, but not limited to:

     (1)   reductions in air pollution, water pollution, land disturbance, and greenhouse gas emissions;

     (2)   reductions in peak demand for electricity and natural gas, and the overall impact on the costs to customers of electricity and natural gas;

     (3)   increases in renewable energy development, manufacturing, investment, and job creation opportunities in this State; and

     (4)   reductions in State and national dependence on the use of fossil fuels.

      p.   Class I RECs and ORECs shall be eligible for use in renewable energy portfolio standards compliance in the energy year in which they are generated, and for the following two energy years.  SRECs shall be eligible for use in renewable energy portfolio standards compliance in the energy year in which they are generated, and for the following four energy years.

      q.   (1)  During the energy years of 2014, 2015, and 2016, a solar electric power generation facility project that is not: (a) net metered; (b) an on-site generation facility; (c) qualified for net metering aggregation; or (d) certified as being located on a brownfield, on an area of historic fill or on a properly closed sanitary landfill facility, as provided pursuant to subsection t. of this section may file an application with the board for approval of a designation pursuant to this subsection that the facility is connected to the distribution system.  An application filed pursuant to this subsection shall include a notice escrow of $40,000 per megawatt of the proposed capacity of the facility.  The board shall approve the designation if: the facility has filed a notice in writing with the board applying for designation pursuant to this subsection, together with the notice escrow; and the capacity of the facility, when added to the capacity of other facilities that have been previously approved for designation prior to the facility's filing under this subsection, does not exceed 80 megawatts in the aggregate for each year. The capacity of any one solar electric power supply project approved pursuant to this subsection shall not exceed 10 megawatts.  No more than 90 days after its receipt of a completed application for designation pursuant to this subsection, the board shall approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the application.  The notice escrow shall be reimbursed to the facility in full upon either rejection by the board or the facility entering commercial operation, or shall be forfeited to the State if the facility is designated pursuant to this subsection but does not enter commercial operation pursuant to paragraph (2) of this subsection.

     (2)   If the proposed solar electric power generation facility does not commence commercial operations within two years following the date of the designation by the board pursuant to this subsection, the designation of the facility shall be deemed to be null and void, and the facility shall not be considered connected to the distribution system thereafter.

     (3)   Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (2) of this subsection, a solar electric power generation facility project that as of May 31, 2017 was designated as "connected to the distribution system," but failed to commence commercial operations as of that date, shall maintain that designation if it commences commercial operations by May 31, 2018.

      r.    (1)  For all proposed solar electric power generation facility projects except for those solar electric power generation facility projects approved pursuant to subsection q. of this section, and for all projects proposed in energy year 2019 and energy year 2020, the board may approve projects for up to 50 megawatts annually in auctioned capacity in two auctions per year as long as the board is accepting applications.  If the board approves projects for less than 50 megawatts in energy year 2019 or less than 50 megawatts in energy year 2020, the difference in each year shall be carried over into the successive energy year until 100 megawatts of auctioned capacity has been approved by the board pursuant to this subsection.  A proposed solar electric power generation facility that is neither net metered nor an on-site generation facility, may be considered "connected to the distribution system" only upon designation as such by the board, after notice to the public and opportunity for public comment or hearing.  A proposed solar power electric generation facility seeking board designation as "connected to the distribution system" shall submit an application to the board that includes for the proposed facility: the nameplate capacity; the estimated energy and number of SRECs to be produced and sold per year; the estimated annual rate impact on ratepayers; the estimated capacity of the generator as defined by PJM for sale in the PJM capacity market; the point of interconnection; the total project acreage and location; the current land use designation of the property; the type of solar technology to be used; and such other information as the board shall require.

     (2)   The board shall approve the designation of the proposed solar power electric generation facility as "connected to the distribution system" if the board determines that:

     (a)   the SRECs forecasted to be produced by the facility do not have a detrimental impact on the SREC market or on the appropriate development of solar power in the State;

     (b)   the approval of the designation of the proposed facility would not significantly impact the preservation of open space in this State;

     (c)   the impact of the designation on electric rates and economic development is beneficial; and

     (d)   there will be no impingement on the ability of an electric public utility to maintain its property and equipment in such a condition as to enable it to provide safe, adequate, and proper service to each of its customers.

     (3)   The board shall act within 90 days of its receipt of a completed application for designation of a solar power electric generation facility as "connected to the distribution system," to either approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the application. If the proposed solar electric power generation facility does not commence commercial operations within two years following the date of the designation by the board pursuant to this subsection, the designation of the facility as "connected to the distribution system" shall be deemed to be null and void, and the facility shall thereafter be considered not "connected to the distribution system."

      s.    In addition to any other requirements of P.L.1999, c.23 or any other law, rule, regulation or order, a solar electric power generation facility that is not net metered or an on-site generation facility and which is located on land that has been actively devoted to agricultural or horticultural use that is valued, assessed, and taxed pursuant to the "Farmland Assessment Act of 1964," P.L.1964, c.48 (C.54:4-23.1 et seq.) at any time within the 10-year period prior to the effective date of P.L.2012, c.24, shall only be considered "connected to the distribution system" if (1) the board approves the facility's designation pursuant to subsection q. of this section; or (2) (a) PJM issued a System Impact Study for the facility on or before June 30, 2011, (b) the facility files a notice with the board within 60 days of the effective date of P.L.2012, c.24, indicating its intent to qualify under this subsection, and (c) the facility has been approved as "connected to the distribution system" by the board.  Nothing in this subsection shall limit the board's authority concerning the review and oversight of facilities, unless such facilities are exempt from such review as a result of having been approved pursuant to subsection q. of this section.

      t.    (1)  No more than 180 days after the date of enactment of P.L.2012, c.24, the board shall, in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection and the New Jersey Economic Development Authority, and, after notice and opportunity for public comment and public hearing, complete a proceeding to establish a program to provide SRECs to owners of solar electric power generation facility projects certified by the board, in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection, as being located on a brownfield, on an area of historic fill or on a properly closed sanitary landfill facility, including those owned or operated by an electric public utility and approved pursuant to section 13 of P.L.2007, c.340 (C.48:3-98.1).  Projects certified under this subsection shall be considered "connected to the distribution system", shall not require such designation by the board, and shall not be subject to board review required pursuant to subsections q. and r. of this section.  Notwithstanding the provisions of section 3 of P.L.1999, c.23 (C.48:3-51) or any other law, rule, regulation, or order to the contrary, for projects certified under this subsection, the board shall establish a financial incentive that is designed to supplement the SRECs generated by the facility in order to cover the additional cost of constructing and operating a solar electric power generation facility on a brownfield, on an area of historic fill or on a properly closed sanitary landfill facility.  Any financial benefit realized in relation to a project owned or operated by an electric public utility and approved by the board pursuant to section 13 of P.L.2007, c.340 (C.48:3-98.1), as a result of the provision of a financial incentive established by the board pursuant to this subsection, shall be credited to ratepayers. The issuance of SRECs for all solar electric power generation facility projects pursuant to this subsection shall be deemed "Board of Public Utilities financial assistance" as provided under section 1 of P.L.2009, c.89 (C.48:2-29.47).

     (2)   Notwithstanding the provisions of the "Spill Compensation and Control Act," P.L.1976, c.141 (C.58:10-23.11 et seq.) or any other law, rule, regulation, or order to the contrary, the board, in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection, may find that a person who operates a solar electric power generation facility project that has commenced operation on or after the effective date of P.L.2012, c.24, which project is certified by the board, in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection, as being located on a brownfield for which a final remediation document has been issued, on an area of historic fill or on a properly closed sanitary landfill facility, which projects shall include, but not be limited to projects located on a brownfield for which a final remediation document has been issued, on an area of historic fill or on a properly closed sanitary landfill facility owned or operated by an electric public utility and approved pursuant to section 13 of P.L.2007, c.340 (C.48:3-98.1), or a person who owns property acquired on or after the effective date of P.L.2012, c.24 on which such a solar electric power generation facility project is constructed and operated, shall not be liable for cleanup and removal costs to the Department of Environmental Protection or to any other person for the discharge of a hazardous substance provided that:

     (a)   the person acquired or leased the real property after the discharge of that hazardous substance at the real property;

     (b)   the person did not discharge the hazardous substance, is not in any way responsible for the hazardous substance, and is not a successor to the discharger or to any person in any way responsible for the hazardous substance or to anyone liable for cleanup and removal costs pursuant to section 8 of P.L.1976, c.141 (C.58:10-23.11g);

     (c)   the person, within 30 days after acquisition of the property, gave notice of the discharge to the Department of Environmental Protection in a manner the Department of Environmental Protection prescribes;

     (d)   the person does not disrupt or change, without prior written permission from the Department of Environmental Protection, any engineering or institutional control that is part of a remedial action for the contaminated site or any landfill closure or post-closure requirement;

     (e)   the person does not exacerbate the contamination at the property;

     (f)   the person does not interfere with any necessary remediation of the property;

     (g)   the person complies with any regulations and any permit the Department of Environmental Protection issues pursuant to section 19 of P.L.2009, c.60 (C.58:10C-19) or paragraph (2) of subsection a. of section 6 of P.L.1970, c.39 (C.13:1E-6);

     (h)   with respect to an area of historic fill, the person has demonstrated pursuant to a preliminary assessment and site investigation, that hazardous substances have not been discharged; and

     (i)    with respect to a properly closed sanitary landfill facility, no person who owns or controls the facility receives, has received, or will receive, with respect to such facility, any funds from any post-closure escrow account established pursuant to section 10 of P.L.1981, c.306 (C.13:1E-109) for the closure and monitoring of the facility.

     Only the person who is liable to clean up and remove the contamination pursuant to section 8 of P.L.1976, c.141 (C.58:10-23.11g) and who does not have a defense to liability pursuant to subsection d. of that section shall be liable for cleanup and removal costs.

     u.    No more than 180 days after the date of enactment of P.L.2012, c.24, the board shall complete a proceeding to establish a registration program.  The registration program shall require the owners of solar electric power generation facility projects connected to the distribution system to make periodic milestone filings with the board in a manner and at such times as determined by the board to provide full disclosure and transparency regarding the overall level of development and construction activity of those projects Statewide.

     v.    The issuance of SRECs for all solar electric power generation facility projects pursuant to this section, for projects connected to the distribution system with a capacity of one megawatt or greater, shall be deemed "Board of Public Utilities financial assistance" as provided pursuant to section 1 of P.L.2009, c.89 (C.48:2-29.47). 

     w.   No more than 270 days after the date of enactment of P.L.2012, c.24, the board shall, after notice and opportunity for public comment and public hearing, complete a proceeding to consider whether to establish a program to provide, to owners of solar electric power generation facility projects certified by the board as being three megawatts or greater in capacity and being net metered, including facilities which are owned or operated by an electric public utility and approved by the board pursuant to section 13 of P.L.2007, c.340 (C.48:3-98.1), a financial incentive that is designed to supplement the SRECs generated by the facility to further the goal of improving the economic competitiveness of commercial and industrial customers taking power from such projects.  If the board determines to establish such a program pursuant to this subsection, the board may establish a financial incentive to provide that the board shall issue one SREC for no less than every 750 kilowatt-hours of solar energy generated by the certified projects. Any financial benefit realized in relation to a project owned or operated by an electric public utility and approved by the board pursuant to section 13 of P.L.2007, c.340 (C.48:3-98.1), as a result of the provisions of a financial incentive established by the board pursuant to this subsection, shall be credited to ratepayers.

     x.    Solar electric power generation facility projects that are located on an existing or proposed commercial, retail, industrial, municipal, professional, recreational, transit, commuter, entertainment complex, multi-use, or mixed-use parking lot with a capacity to park 350 or more vehicles where the area to be utilized for the facility is paved, or an impervious surface may be owned or operated by an electric public utility and may be approved by the board pursuant to section 13 of P.L.2007, c.340 (C.48:3-98.1).

(cf:  P.L.2018, c.17, s.2)

 

     2.    This act shall take effect immediately.

 

 

STATEMENT

 

     This bill would allow the Board of Public Utilities (BPU) to increase the cost to customers of the State’s Class I renewable energy requirement during energy years 2022 through 2024 above the current limit of seven percent of the total paid for electricity by all customers in the State, under certain conditions.

     Under the bill, the BPU could only make this increase if the cost of the Class I renewable energy requirement is less than nine percent of total energy costs during energy years 2019 through 2021 (the limit set by current law).  In addition, the total amount paid by customers during energy years 2019 through 2024 could not exceed the sum of: (1) nine percent of total energy costs during energy years 2019 through 2021; and (2) seven percent of total energy costs during energy years 2022 through 2024, i.e. the maximum amount allowed by current law over that six-year period.

     “Energy year” means the 12-month period from June 1st through May 31st, numbered according to the calendar year in which it ends. 

DISCLAIMER: New Jersey SREC prices are volatile. Buyers and sellers of SRECs must do their own research. The above projections are subject to change as market dynamics change.

TAGS:
New JerseyPress ReleasesSREC

New Jersey Assembly Bill 5741

 

This is a bill, not yet a law.
 
Main Points:
 
Increases Net metering cap from 5.8% to 15% - without this new solar starting in 2021 will not be financeable.
 
Adjusts Ratepayer cap from current 9% moving to 7% in 2022 to a gradual step-down 9% to 8.5% to 8.0% to 5% in 2036. Solves for the "kink-years" where there is no $ for new solar in 2022,2023 and 2024. Net neutral for ratepayers. Prevents solar companies in NJ from going out of business.
 
Reduces class 1 rec ratepayer exposure from 5cents a kilowatt hour to 1 cent a kilowatt hour. Prevents money from being taken from solar owners SREC proceeds and being sent out-of-state.
 
Establishes demand for 360 Mw a year of new solar being built until 2036. Doubles the amount of solar by 2030 to 6.25 Gw. and 11% of statewide energy from solar.
 
SREC SACP levels reduced to match rate-caps. New demand helps ensure SREC prices remain stable to strong and that solar investors remain whole.
 
Keeps old and new solar owners interests aligned by keeping one SREC market.
 

-----------------------------------------------------------

Sponsored by:

Assemblyman  JOHN F. MCKEON

District 27 (Essex and Morris)

 

 

SYNOPSIS

     Revises law concerning Class I and solar renewable energy portfolio standards, solar renewable energy certificates, and net metering.

 

CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT

     As introduced.

  

 

An Act concerning Class I and solar renewable energy and net metering, and amending P.L.1999, c.23.

 

     Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

 

     1.  Section 38 of P.L.1999, c.23 (C.48:3-87) is amended to read as follows:

     38.  a.  The board shall require an electric power supplier or basic generation service provider to disclose on a customer's bill or on customer contracts or marketing materials, a uniform, common set of information about the environmental characteristics of the energy purchased by the customer, including, but not limited to:

     (1)   Its fuel mix, including categories for oil, gas, nuclear, coal, solar, hydroelectric, wind and biomass, or a regional average determined by the board;

     (2)   Its emissions, in pounds per megawatt hour, of sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide, oxides of nitrogen, and any other pollutant that the board may determine to pose an environmental or health hazard, or an emissions default to be determined by the board; and

     (3)   Any discrete emission reduction retired pursuant to rules and regulations adopted pursuant to P.L.1995, c.188.

     b.    Notwithstanding any provisions of the "Administrative Procedure Act," P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.) to the contrary, the board shall initiate a proceeding and shall adopt, in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection, after notice and opportunity for public comment and public hearing, interim standards to implement this disclosure requirement, including, but not limited to:

     (1)   A methodology for disclosure of emissions based on output pounds per megawatt hour;

     (2)   Benchmarks for all suppliers and basic generation service providers to use in disclosing emissions that will enable consumers to perform a meaningful comparison with a supplier's or basic generation service provider's emission levels; and

     (3)   A uniform emissions disclosure format that is graphic in nature and easily understandable by consumers.  The board shall periodically review the disclosure requirements to determine if revisions to the environmental disclosure system as implemented are necessary.

     Such standards shall be effective as regulations immediately upon filing with the Office of Administrative Law and shall be effective for a period not to exceed 18 months, and may, thereafter, be amended, adopted or readopted by the board in accordance with the provisions of the "Administrative Procedure Act."

     c.  (1)  The board may adopt, in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection, after notice and opportunity for public comment, an emissions portfolio standard applicable to all electric power suppliers and basic generation service providers, upon a finding that:

     (a)   The standard is necessary as part of a plan to enable the State to meet federal Clean Air Act or State ambient air quality standards; and

     (b)   Actions at the regional or federal level cannot reasonably be expected to achieve the compliance with the federal standards.

     (2)   By July 1, 2009, the board shall adopt, pursuant to the "Administrative Procedure Act," P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.), a greenhouse gas emissions portfolio standard to mitigate leakage or another regulatory mechanism to mitigate leakage applicable to all electric power suppliers and basic generation service providers that provide electricity to customers within the State.  The greenhouse gas emissions portfolio standard or any other regulatory mechanism to mitigate leakage shall:

     (a)   Allow a transition period, either before or after the effective date of the regulation to mitigate leakage, for a basic generation service provider or electric power supplier to either meet the emissions portfolio standard or other regulatory mechanism to mitigate leakage, or to transfer any customer to a basic generation service provider or electric power supplier that meets the emissions portfolio standard or other regulatory mechanism to mitigate leakage.  If the transition period allowed pursuant to this subparagraph occurs after the implementation of an emissions portfolio standard or other regulatory mechanism to mitigate leakage, the transition period shall be no longer than three years; and

     (b)   Exempt the provision of basic generation service pursuant to a basic generation service purchase and sale agreement effective prior to the date of the regulation.

     Unless the Attorney General or the Attorney General's designee determines that a greenhouse gas emissions portfolio standard would unconstitutionally burden interstate commerce or would be preempted by federal law, the adoption by the board of an electric energy efficiency portfolio standard pursuant to subsection g. of this section, a gas energy efficiency portfolio standard pursuant to subsection h. of this section, or any other enhanced energy efficiency policies to mitigate leakage shall not be considered sufficient to fulfill the requirement of this subsection for the adoption of a greenhouse gas emissions portfolio standard or any other regulatory mechanism to mitigate leakage.

     d.    Notwithstanding any provisions of the "Administrative Procedure Act," P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.) to the contrary, the board shall initiate a proceeding and shall adopt, after notice, provision of the opportunity for comment, and public hearing, renewable energy portfolio standards that shall require:

     (1)   that two and one-half percent of the kilowatt hours sold in this State by each electric power supplier and each basic generation service provider be from Class II renewable energy sources;

     (2)   beginning on January 1, 2020, that  21 percent of the kilowatt hours sold in this State by each electric power supplier and each basic generation service provider be from Class I renewable energy sources.  The board shall increase the required percentage for Class I renewable energy sources so that by January 1, 2025, 35 percent of the kilowatt hours sold in this State by each electric power supplier and each basic generation service provider shall be from Class I renewable energy sources, and by January 1, 2030, 50 percent of the kilowatt hours sold in this State by each electric power supplier and each basic generation service provider shall be from Class I renewable energy sources. 

     Notwithstanding the requirements of this subsection, the board shall ensure that the cost to customers of the Class I renewable energy requirement imposed pursuant to this subsection :

     (a)  shall not exceed nine percent of the total paid for electricity by all customers in the State for energy year 2019, energy year 2020, and energy year 2021, respectively [,] ; and

     (b)  shall not exceed [seven percent] the following percentages of the total paid for electricity by all customers in the State [in any] for energy year [thereafter] 2022 through energy year 2037:

     EY 2022                 8.5%

     EY 2023                 8.5%

     EY 2024                 8%

     EY 2025                 8%

     EY 2026                 7.5%

     EY 2027                 7.5%

     EY 2028                 7%

     EY 2029                 7%

     EY 2030                 6.5%

     EY 2031                 6.5%

     EY 2032                 6%

     EY 2033                 6%

     EY 2034                 5.5%

     EY 2035                 5.5%

     EY 2036                 5%

     EY 2037                 5% . 

     In calculating the cost to customers of the Class I renewable energy requirement imposed pursuant to this subsection, the board shall not include the costs of the offshore wind energy certificate program established pursuant to paragraph (4) of this subsection.  The board shall take any steps necessary to prevent the exceedance of the cap on the cost to customers including, but not limited to, adjusting the Class I renewable energy requirement.

     An electric power supplier or basic generation service provider may satisfy the requirements of this subsection for Class I renewable energy by participating in a renewable energy trading program approved by the board in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection or by submitting a Class I alternative compliance payment in the amount of $10 for energy year 2021 through energy year 2037.  Any Class I alternative compliance payment collected pursuant to this paragraph shall be refunded directly to the ratepayers ;

     (3)   that the board establish a multi-year schedule, applicable to each electric power supplier or basic generation service provider in this State, beginning with the one-year period commencing on June 1, 2010, and continuing for each subsequent one-year period up to and including, the one-year period commencing on June 1, [2033] 2037 , that requires the following number or percentage, as the case may be, of kilowatt-hours sold in this State by each electric power supplier and each basic generation service provider to be from solar electric power generators connected to the distribution system in this State:

     EY 2011                 306 Gigawatthours (Gwhrs)

     EY 2012                 442 Gwhrs

     EY 2013                 596 Gwhrs

     EY 2014                 2.050%

     EY 2015                 2.450%

     EY 2016                 2.750%

     EY 2017                 3.000%

     EY 2018                 3.200%

     EY 2019                 4.300%

     EY 2020                 4.900%

     EY 2021                 [5.100%] 5.25%

     EY 2022                 [5.100%] 5.88%

     EY 2023                 [5.100%] 6.05%

     EY 2024                 [4.900%] 6.29%

     EY 2025                 [4.800%] 6.58%

     EY 2026                 [4.500%] 6.39%

     EY 2027                 [4.350%] 6.36%

     EY 2028                 [3.740%] 6.17%

     EY 2029                 [3.070%] 5.82%

     EY 2030                 [2.210%] 5.49%

     EY 2031                 [1.580%] 4.88%

     EY 2032                 [1.400%] 4.36%

     EY 2033                 [1.100%] 3.87%

     EY 2034                 3.87%

     EY 2035                 3.87%

     EY 2036                 3.87%

     EY 2037                 3.87%

     [No later than 180 days after the date of enactment of P.L.2018, c.17 (C.48:3-87.8 et al.), the board shall adopt rules and regulations to close the SREC program to new applications upon the attainment of 5.1 percent of the kilowatt-hours sold in the State by each electric power supplier and each basic generation provider from solar electric power generators connected to the distribution system.  The board shall continue to consider any application filed before the date of enactment of P.L.2018, c.17 (C.48:3-87.8 et al.).  The board shall provide for an orderly and transparent mechanism that will result in the closing of the existing SREC program on a date certain but no later than June 1, 2021.]

     No later than 24 months after the date of enactment of P.L.2018, c.17 (C.48:3-87.8 et al.), the board shall complete a study [that evaluates how to modify or replace the SREC program to encourage the continued efficient and orderly development of solar renewable energy generating sources throughout the State.  The board shall submit the written report thereon to the Governor and, pursuant to section 2 of P.L.1991, c.164 (C.52:14-19.1), to the Legislature.  The board shall consult with public utilities, industry experts, regional grid operators, solar power providers and financiers, and other State agencies to determine whether the board can modify the SREC program such that the program will:

     -continually reduce, where feasible, the cost of achieving the solar energy goals set forth in this subsection;

     -provide an orderly transition from the SREC program to a new or modified program;

     -] to develop megawatt targets for grid connected and distribution systems, including residential and small commercial rooftop systems, community solar systems, and large scale behind the meter systems, as a share of the overall solar energy requirement, which targets the board may modify periodically based on the cost, feasibility, or social impacts of different types of projects [;

     -establish and update market-based maximum incentive payment caps periodically for each of the above categories of solar electric power generation facilities;

     -encourage and facilitate market-based cost recovery through long-term contracts and energy market sales; and

     -where cost recovery is needed for any portion of an efficient solar electric power generation facility when costs are not recoverable through wholesale market sales and direct payments from customers, utilize competitive processes such as competitive procurement and long-term contracts where possible to ensure such recovery, without exceeding the maximum incentive payment cap for that category of facility] .  The board shall submit a written report thereon to the Governor and, pursuant to section 2 of P.L.1991, c.164 (C.52:14-19.1), to the Legislature . 

     The board shall approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove any application for designation as connected to the distribution system of a solar electric power generation facility filed with the board after the date of enactment of P.L.2018, c.17 (C.48:3-87.8 et al.), no more than 90 days after receipt by the board of a completed application.  For any such application for a project greater than 25 kilowatts, the board shall require the applicant to post a notice escrow with the board in an amount of $40 per kilowatt of DC nameplate capacity of the facility, not to exceed $40,000.  The notice escrow amount shall be reimbursed to the applicant in full upon either denial of the application by the board or upon commencement of commercial operation of the solar electric power generation facility.  The escrow amount shall be forfeited to the State if the facility is designated as connected to the distribution system pursuant to this subsection but does not commence commercial operation within two years following the date of the designation by the board.

     For all applications for designation as connected to the distribution system of a solar electric power generation facility filed with the board after the date of enactment of P.L.2018, c.17 (C.48:3-87.8 et al.), the SREC term shall be 10 years.

     (a)   The board shall determine an appropriate period of no less than 120 days following the end of an energy year prior to which a provider or supplier must demonstrate compliance for that energy year with the annual renewable portfolio standard;

     (b)   No more than 24 months following the date of enactment of P.L.2012, c.24, the board shall complete a proceeding to investigate approaches to mitigate solar development volatility and prepare and submit, pursuant to section 2 of P.L.1991, c.164 (C.52:14-19.1), a report to the Legislature, detailing its findings and recommendations.  As part of the proceeding, the board shall evaluate other techniques used nationally and internationally;

     (c)   The solar renewable portfolio standards requirements in this paragraph shall exempt those existing supply contracts which are effective prior to the date of enactment of P.L.2018, c.17 (C.48:3-87.8 et al.) from any increase beyond the number of SRECs mandated by the solar renewable energy portfolio standards requirements that were in effect on the date that the providers executed their existing supply contracts.  This limited exemption for providers' existing supply contracts shall not be construed to lower the Statewide solar sourcing requirements set forth in this paragraph.  Such incremental requirements that would have otherwise been imposed on exempt providers shall be distributed over the providers not subject to the existing supply contract exemption until such time as existing supply contracts expire and all providers are subject to the new requirement in a manner that is competitively neutral among all providers and suppliers.  Notwithstanding any rule or regulation to the contrary, the board shall recognize these new solar purchase obligations as a change required by operation of law and implement the provisions of this subsection in a manner so as to prevent any subsidies between suppliers and providers and to promote competition in the electricity supply industry.

     An electric power supplier or basic generation service provider may satisfy the requirements of this subsection by participating in a renewable energy trading program approved by the board in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection, or compliance with the requirements of this subsection may be demonstrated to the board by suppliers or providers through the purchase of SRECs.

     The renewable energy portfolio standards adopted by the board pursuant to paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection shall be effective as regulations immediately upon filing with the Office of Administrative Law and shall be effective for a period not to exceed 18 months, and may, thereafter, be amended, adopted or readopted by the board in accordance with the provisions of the "Administrative Procedure Act."

     The renewable energy portfolio standards adopted by the board pursuant to this paragraph shall be effective as regulations immediately upon filing with the Office of Administrative Law and shall be effective for a period not to exceed 30 months after such filing, and shall, thereafter, be amended, adopted or readopted by the board in accordance with the "Administrative Procedure Act"; and

     (4)   within 180 days after the date of enactment of P.L.2010, c.57 (C.48:3-87.1 et al.), that the board establish an offshore wind renewable energy certificate program to require that a percentage of the kilowatt hours sold in this State by each electric power supplier and each basic generation service provider be from offshore wind energy in order to support at least 3,500 megawatts of generation from qualified offshore wind projects.

     The percentage established by the board pursuant to this paragraph shall serve as an offset to the renewable energy portfolio standard established pursuant to paragraph (2) of this subsection and shall reduce the corresponding Class I renewable energy requirement.

     The percentage established by the board pursuant to this paragraph shall reflect the projected OREC production of each qualified offshore wind project, approved by the board pursuant to section 3 of P.L.2010, c.57 (C.48:3-87.1), for 20 years from the commercial operation start date of the qualified offshore wind project which production projection and OREC purchase requirement, once approved by the board, shall not be subject to reduction.

     An electric power supplier or basic generation service provider shall comply with the OREC program established pursuant to this paragraph through the purchase of offshore wind renewable energy certificates at a price and for the time period required by the board.  In the event there are insufficient offshore wind renewable energy certificates available, the electric power supplier or basic generation service provider shall pay an offshore wind alternative compliance payment established by the board.  Any offshore wind alternative compliance payments collected shall be refunded directly to the ratepayers by the electric public utilities.

     The rules established by the board pursuant to this paragraph shall be effective as regulations immediately upon filing with the Office of Administrative Law and shall be effective for a period not to exceed 18 months, and may, thereafter, be amended, adopted or readopted by the board in accordance with the provisions of the "Administrative Procedure Act," P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.).

     e.     Notwithstanding any provisions of the "Administrative Procedure Act," P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.) to the contrary, the board shall initiate a proceeding and shall adopt, after notice, provision of the opportunity for comment, and public hearing:

     (1)   net metering standards for electric power suppliers and basic generation service providers.  The standards shall require electric power suppliers and basic generation service providers to offer net metering at non-discriminatory rates to industrial, large commercial, residential and small commercial customers, as those customers are classified or defined by the board, that generate electricity, on the customer's side of the meter, using a Class I renewable energy source, for the net amount of electricity supplied by the electric power supplier or basic generation service provider over an annualized period.  Systems of any sized capacity, as measured in watts, are eligible for net metering.  If the amount of electricity generated by the customer-generator, plus any kilowatt hour credits held over from the previous billing periods, exceeds the electricity supplied by the electric power supplier or basic generation service provider, then the electric power supplier or basic generation service provider, as the case may be, shall credit the customer-generator for the excess kilowatt hours until the end of the annualized period at which point the customer-generator will be compensated for any remaining credits or, if the customer-generator chooses, credit the customer-generator on a real-time basis, at the electric power supplier's or basic generation service provider's avoided cost of wholesale power or the PJM electric power pool's real-time locational marginal pricing rate, adjusted for losses, for the respective zone in the PJM electric power pool.  Alternatively, the customer-generator may execute a bilateral agreement with an electric power supplier or basic generation service provider for the sale and purchase of the customer-generator's excess generation. The customer-generator may be credited on a real-time basis, so long as the customer-generator follows applicable rules prescribed by the PJM electric power pool for its capacity requirements for the net amount of electricity supplied by the electric power supplier or basic generation service provider.  The board may authorize an electric power supplier or basic generation service provider to cease offering net metering to customers that are not already net metered whenever the total rated generating capacity owned and operated by net metering customer-generators Statewide equals [5.8] 15 percent of the total annual kilowatt-hours sold in this State by each electric power supplier and each basic generation service provider during the prior one-year period;

     (2)   safety and power quality interconnection standards for Class I renewable energy source systems used by a customer-generator that shall be eligible for net metering.

     Such standards or rules shall take into consideration the goals of the New Jersey Energy Master Plan, applicable industry standards, and the standards of other states and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.  The board shall allow electric public utilities to recover the costs of any new net meters, upgraded net meters, system reinforcements or upgrades, and interconnection costs through either their regulated rates or from the net metering customer-generator;

     (3)   credit or other incentive rules for generators using Class I renewable energy generation systems that connect to New Jersey's electric public utilities' distribution system but who do not net meter; and

     (4)   net metering aggregation standards to require electric public utilities to provide net metering aggregation to single electric public utility customers that operate a solar electric power generation system installed at one of the customer's facilities or on property owned by the customer, provided that any such customer is a State entity, school district, county, county agency, county authority, municipality, municipal agency, or municipal authority.  The standards shall provide that, in order to qualify for net metering aggregation, the customer must operate a solar electric power generation system using a net metering billing account, which system is located on property owned by the customer, provided that: (a) the property is not land that has been actively devoted to agricultural or horticultural use and that is valued, assessed, and taxed pursuant to the "Farmland Assessment Act of 1964," P.L.1964, c.48 (C.54:4-23.1 et seq.) at any time within the 10-year period prior to the effective date of P.L.2012, c.24, provided, however, that the municipal planning board of a municipality in which a solar electric power generation system is located may waive the requirement of this subparagraph (a), (b) the system is not an on-site generation facility, (c) all of the facilities of the single customer combined for the purpose of net metering aggregation are facilities owned or operated by the single customer and are located within its territorial jurisdiction except that all of the facilities of a State entity engaged in net metering aggregation shall be located within five miles of one another, and (d) all of those facilities are within the service territory of a single electric public utility and are all served by the same basic generation service provider or by the same electric power supplier.  The standards shall provide that in order to qualify for net metering aggregation, the customer's solar electric power generation system shall be sized so that its annual generation does not exceed the combined metered annual energy usage of the qualified customer facilities, and the qualified customer facilities shall all be in the same customer rate class under the applicable electric public utility tariff.  For the customer's facility or property on which the solar electric generation system is installed, the electricity generated from the customer's solar electric generation system shall be accounted for pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of this subsection to provide that the electricity generated in excess of the electricity supplied by the electric power supplier or the basic generation service provider, as the case may be, for the customer's facility on which the solar electric generation system is installed, over the annualized period, is credited at the electric power supplier's or the basic generation service provider's avoided cost of wholesale power or the PJM electric power pool real-time locational marginal pricing rate.  All electricity used by the customer's qualified facilities, with the exception of the facility or property on which the solar electric power generation system is installed, shall be billed at the full retail rate pursuant to the electric public utility tariff applicable to the customer class of the customer using the electricity.  A customer may contract with a third party to operate a solar electric power generation system, for the purpose of net metering aggregation.  Any contractual relationship entered into for operation of a solar electric power generation system related to net metering aggregation shall include contractual protections that provide for adequate performance and provision for construction and operation for the term of the contract, including any appropriate bonding or escrow requirements.  Any incremental cost to an electric public utility for net metering aggregation shall be fully and timely recovered in a manner to be determined by the board.  The board shall adopt net metering aggregation standards within 270 days after the effective date of P.L.2012, c.24.

     Such rules shall require the board or its designee to issue a credit or other incentive to those generators that do not use a net meter but otherwise generate electricity derived from a Class I renewable energy source and to issue an enhanced credit or other incentive, including, but not limited to, a solar renewable energy credit, to those generators that generate electricity derived from solar technologies.

     Such standards or rules shall be effective as regulations immediately upon filing with the Office of Administrative Law and shall be effective for a period not to exceed 18 months, and may, thereafter, be amended, adopted or readopted by the board in accordance with the provisions of the "Administrative Procedure Act."

     f.     The board may assess, by written order and after notice and opportunity for comment, a separate fee to cover the cost of implementing and overseeing an emission disclosure system or emission portfolio standard, which fee shall be assessed based on an electric power supplier's or basic generation service provider's share of the retail electricity supply market.  The board shall not impose a fee for the cost of implementing and overseeing a greenhouse gas emissions portfolio standard adopted pursuant to paragraph (2) of subsection c. of this section.

     g.    The board shall adopt, pursuant to the "Administrative Procedure Act," P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.), an electric energy efficiency  program in order to ensure investment in cost-effective energy efficiency measures, ensure universal access to energy efficiency measures, and serve the needs of low-income communities that shall require each electric public utility to implement energy efficiency measures that reduce electricity usage in the State  pursuant to section 3 of P.L.2018, c.17 (C.48:3-87.9).  Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prevent an electric public utility from meeting the requirements of this subsection by contracting with another entity for the performance of the requirements.

     h.    The board shall adopt, pursuant to the "Administrative Procedure Act," P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.), a gas energy efficiency program in order to ensure investment in cost-effective energy efficiency measures, ensure universal access to energy efficiency measures, and serve the needs of low-income communities that shall require each gas public utility to implement energy efficiency measures that reduce natural gas usage in the State pursuant to section 3 of P.L.2018, c.17 (C.48:3-87.9).  Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prevent a gas public utility from meeting the requirements of this subsection by contracting with another entity for the performance of the requirements.

     i.     After the board establishes a schedule of solar kilowatt-hour sale or purchase requirements pursuant to paragraph (3) of subsection d. of this section, the board may initiate subsequent proceedings and adopt, after appropriate notice and opportunity for public comment and public hearing, increased minimum solar kilowatt-hour sale or purchase requirements, provided that the board shall not reduce previously established minimum solar kilowatt-hour sale or purchase requirements, or otherwise impose constraints that reduce the requirements by any means.

     j.     The board shall determine an appropriate level of solar alternative compliance payment, and permit each supplier or provider to submit an SACP to comply with the solar electric generation requirements of paragraph (3) of subsection d. of this section.  The value of the SACP for each Energy Year, for Energy Years 2014 through [2033] 2037 per megawatt hour from solar electric generation required pursuant to this section, shall be:

     EY 2014     $339

     EY 2015     $331

     EY 2016     $323

     EY 2017     $315

     EY 2018     $308

     EY 2019     $268

     EY 2020     $258

     EY 2021     [$248] $220.51

     EY 2022     [$238] $188.49

     EY 2023     [$228] $186.71

     EY 2024     [$218] $170.77

     EY 2025     [$208] $144.28

     EY 2026     [$198] $138.82

     EY 2027     [$188] $142.12

     EY 2028     [$178] $135.96

     EY 2029     [$168] $146.34

     EY 2030     [$158] $113.68

     EY 2031     [$148] $129.99

     EY 2032     [$138] $128.28

     EY 2033     [$128] $120

     EY 2034     $120

     EY 2035     $120

     EY 2036     $120

     EY 2037     $120 .

     The board may initiate subsequent proceedings and adopt, after appropriate notice and opportunity for public comment and public hearing, an increase in solar alternative compliance payments, provided that the board shall not reduce previously established levels of solar alternative compliance payments, nor shall the board provide relief from the obligation of payment of the SACP by the electric power suppliers or basic generation service providers in any form.  Any SACP payments collected shall first be made available once a year in an auction format approved by the board to owners of solar electric generation facilities possessing unsold SRECs, and following the annual auction any remaining SACP payments shall be refunded directly to the ratepayers by the electric public utilities.

     k.    The board may allow electric public utilities to offer long-term contracts through a competitive process, direct electric public utility investment and other means of financing, including but not limited to loans, for the purchase of SRECs and the resale of SRECs to suppliers or providers or others, provided that after such contracts have been approved by the board, the board's approvals shall not be modified by subsequent board orders.  If the board allows the offering of contracts pursuant to this subsection, the board may establish a process, after hearing, and opportunity for public comment, to provide that a designated segment of the contracts approved pursuant to this subsection shall be contracts involving solar electric power generation facility projects with a capacity of up to 250 kilowatts.

     l.     The board shall implement its responsibilities under the provisions of this section in such a manner as to:

     (1)   place greater reliance on competitive markets, with the explicit goal of encouraging and ensuring the emergence of new entrants that can foster innovations and price competition;

     (2)   maintain adequate regulatory authority over non-competitive public utility services;

     (3)   consider alternative forms of regulation in order to address changes in the technology and structure of electric public utilities;

     (4)   promote energy efficiency and Class I renewable energy market development, taking into consideration environmental benefits and market barriers;

     (5)   make energy services more affordable for low and moderate income customers;

     (6)   attempt to transform the renewable energy market into one that can move forward without subsidies from the State or public utilities;

     (7)   achieve the goals put forth under the renewable energy portfolio standards;

     (8)   promote the lowest cost to ratepayers; and

     (9)   allow all market segments to participate.

     m.   The board shall ensure the availability of financial incentives under its jurisdiction, including, but not limited to, long-term contracts, loans, SRECs, or other financial support, to ensure market diversity, competition, and appropriate coverage across all ratepayer segments, including, but not limited to, residential, commercial, industrial, non-profit, farms, schools, and public entity customers.

     n.    For projects which are owned, or directly invested in, by a public utility pursuant to section 13 of P.L.2007, c.340 (C.48:3-98.1), the board shall determine the number of SRECs with which such projects shall be credited; and in determining such number the board shall ensure that the market for SRECs does not detrimentally affect the development of non-utility solar projects and shall consider how its determination may impact the ratepayers.

     o.    The board, in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection, electric public utilities, the Division of Rate Counsel in, but not of, the Department of the Treasury, affected members of the solar energy industry, and relevant stakeholders, shall periodically consider increasing the renewable energy portfolio standards beyond the minimum amounts set forth in subsection d. of this section, taking into account the cost impacts and public benefits of such increases including, but not limited to:

     (1)   reductions in air pollution, water pollution, land disturbance, and greenhouse gas emissions;

     (2)   reductions in peak demand for electricity and natural gas, and the overall impact on the costs to customers of electricity and natural gas;

     (3)   increases in renewable energy development, manufacturing, investment, and job creation opportunities in this State; and

     (4)   reductions in State and national dependence on the use of fossil fuels.

     p.    Class I RECs and ORECs shall be eligible for use in renewable energy portfolio standards compliance in the energy year in which they are generated, and for the following two energy years.  SRECs shall be eligible for use in renewable energy portfolio standards compliance in the energy year in which they are generated, and for the following four energy years.

     q.  (1)  During the energy years of 2014, 2015, and 2016, a solar electric power generation facility project that is not: (a) net metered; (b) an on-site generation facility; (c) qualified for net metering aggregation; or (d) certified as being located on a brownfield, on an area of historic fill or on a properly closed sanitary landfill facility, as provided pursuant to subsection t. of this section may file an application with the board for approval of a designation pursuant to this subsection that the facility is connected to the distribution system.  An application filed pursuant to this subsection shall include a notice escrow of $40,000 per megawatt of the proposed capacity of the facility.  The board shall approve the designation if: the facility has filed a notice in writing with the board applying for designation pursuant to this subsection, together with the notice escrow; and the capacity of the facility, when added to the capacity of other facilities that have been previously approved for designation prior to the facility's filing under this subsection, does not exceed 80 megawatts in the aggregate for each year.  The capacity of any one solar electric power supply project approved pursuant to this subsection shall not exceed 10 megawatts.  No more than 90 days after its receipt of a completed application for designation pursuant to this subsection, the board shall approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the application.  The notice escrow shall be reimbursed to the facility in full upon either rejection by the board or the facility entering commercial operation, or shall be forfeited to the State if the facility is designated pursuant to this subsection but does not enter commercial operation pursuant to paragraph (2) of this subsection.

     (2)   If the proposed solar electric power generation facility does not commence commercial operations within two years following the date of the designation by the board pursuant to this subsection, the designation of the facility shall be deemed to be null and void, and the facility shall not be considered connected to the distribution system thereafter.

     (3)   Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (2) of this subsection, a solar electric power generation facility project that as of May 31, 2017 was designated as "connected to the distribution system," but failed to commence commercial operations as of that date, shall maintain that designation if it commences commercial operations by May 31, 2018.

     r.  (1) For all proposed solar electric power generation facility projects except for those solar electric power generation facility projects approved pursuant to subsection q. of this section, and for all projects proposed in energy year 2019 and energy year 2020, the board may approve projects for up to 50 megawatts annually in auctioned capacity in two auctions per year as long as the board is accepting applications.  If the board approves projects for less than 50 megawatts in energy year 2019 or less than 50 megawatts in energy year 2020, the difference in each year shall be carried over into the successive energy year until 100 megawatts of auctioned capacity has been approved by the board pursuant to this subsection.  A proposed solar electric power generation facility that is neither net metered nor an on-site generation facility, may be considered "connected to the distribution system" only upon designation as such by the board, after notice to the public and opportunity for public comment or hearing.  A proposed solar power electric generation facility seeking board designation as "connected to the distribution system" shall submit an application to the board that includes for the proposed facility: the nameplate capacity; the estimated energy and number of SRECs to be produced and sold per year; the estimated annual rate impact on ratepayers; the estimated capacity of the generator as defined by PJM for sale in the PJM capacity market; the point of interconnection; the total project acreage and location; the current land use designation of the property; the type of solar technology to be used; and such other information as the board shall require.

     (2)   The board shall approve the designation of the proposed solar power electric generation facility as "connected to the distribution system" if the board determines that:

     (a)   the SRECs forecasted to be produced by the facility do not have a detrimental impact on the SREC market or on the appropriate development of solar power in the State;

     (b)   the approval of the designation of the proposed facility would not significantly impact the preservation of open space in this State;

     (c)   the impact of the designation on electric rates and economic development is beneficial; and

     (d)   there will be no impingement on the ability of an electric public utility to maintain its property and equipment in such a condition as to enable it to provide safe, adequate, and proper service to each of its customers.

     (3)   The board shall act within 90 days of its receipt of a completed application for designation of a solar power electric generation facility as "connected to the distribution system," to either approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the application.  If the proposed solar electric power generation facility does not commence commercial operations within two years following the date of the designation by the board pursuant to this subsection, the designation of the facility as "connected to the distribution system" shall be deemed to be null and void, and the facility shall thereafter be considered not "connected to the distribution system."

     s.     In addition to any other requirements of P.L.1999, c.23 or any other law, rule, regulation or order, a solar electric power generation facility that is not net metered or an on-site generation facility and which is located on land that has been actively devoted to agricultural or horticultural use that is valued, assessed, and taxed pursuant to the "Farmland Assessment Act of 1964," P.L.1964, c.48 (C.54:4-23.1 et seq.) at any time within the 10-year period prior to the effective date of P.L.2012, c.24, shall only be considered "connected to the distribution system" if (1) the board approves the facility's designation pursuant to subsection q. of this section; or (2) (a) PJM issued a System Impact Study for the facility on or before June 30, 2011, (b) the facility files a notice with the board within 60 days of the effective date of P.L.2012, c.24, indicating its intent to qualify under this subsection, and (c) the facility has been approved as "connected to the distribution system" by the board.  Nothing in this subsection shall limit the board's authority concerning the review and oversight of facilities, unless such facilities are exempt from such review as a result of having been approved pursuant to subsection q. of this section.

     t.  (1) No more than 180 days after the date of enactment of P.L.2012, c.24, the board shall, in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection and the New Jersey Economic Development Authority, and, after notice and opportunity for public comment and public hearing, complete a proceeding to establish a program to provide SRECs to owners of solar electric power generation facility projects certified by the board, in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection, as being located on a brownfield, on an area of historic fill or on a properly closed sanitary landfill facility, including those owned or operated by an electric public utility and approved pursuant to section 13 of P.L.2007, c.340 (C.48:3-98.1).  Projects certified under this subsection shall be considered "connected to the distribution system", shall not require such designation by the board, and shall not be subject to board review required pursuant to subsections q. and r. of this section.  Notwithstanding the provisions of section 3 of P.L.1999, c.23 (C.48:3-51) or any other law, rule, regulation, or order to the contrary, for projects certified under this subsection, the board shall establish a financial incentive that is designed to supplement the SRECs generated by the facility in order to cover the additional cost of constructing and operating a solar electric power generation facility on a brownfield, on an area of historic fill or on a properly closed sanitary landfill facility.  Any financial benefit realized in relation to a project owned or operated by an electric public utility and approved by the board pursuant to section 13 of P.L.2007, c.340 (C.48:3-98.1), as a result of the provision of a financial incentive established by the board pursuant to this subsection, shall be credited to ratepayers. The issuance of SRECs for all solar electric power generation facility projects pursuant to this subsection shall be deemed "Board of Public Utilities financial assistance" as provided under section 1 of P.L.2009, c.89 (C.48:2-29.47).

     (2)   Notwithstanding the provisions of the "Spill Compensation and Control Act," P.L.1976, c.141 (C.58:10-23.11 et seq.) or any other law, rule, regulation, or order to the contrary, the board, in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection, may find that a person who operates a solar electric power generation facility project that has commenced operation on or after the effective date of P.L.2012, c.24, which project is certified by the board, in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection, as being located on a brownfield for which a final remediation document has been issued, on an area of historic fill or on a properly closed sanitary landfill facility, which projects shall include, but not be limited to projects located on a brownfield for which a final remediation document has been issued, on an area of historic fill or on a properly closed sanitary landfill facility owned or operated by an electric public utility and approved pursuant to section 13 of P.L.2007, c.340 (C.48:3-98.1), or a person who owns property acquired on or after the effective date of P.L.2012, c.24 on which such a solar electric power generation facility project is constructed and operated, shall not be liable for cleanup and removal costs to the Department of Environmental Protection or to any other person for the discharge of a hazardous substance provided that:

     (a)   the person acquired or leased the real property after the discharge of that hazardous substance at the real property;

     (b)   the person did not discharge the hazardous substance, is not in any way responsible for the hazardous substance, and is not a successor to the discharger or to any person in any way responsible for the hazardous substance or to anyone liable for cleanup and removal costs pursuant to section 8 of P.L.1976, c.141 (C.58:10-23.11g);

     (c)   the person, within 30 days after acquisition of the property, gave notice of the discharge to the Department of Environmental Protection in a manner the Department of Environmental Protection prescribes;

     (d)   the person does not disrupt or change, without prior written permission from the Department of Environmental Protection, any engineering or institutional control that is part of a remedial action for the contaminated site or any landfill closure or post-closure requirement;

     (e)   the person does not exacerbate the contamination at the property;

     (f)   the person does not interfere with any necessary remediation of the property;

     (g)   the person complies with any regulations and any permit the Department of Environmental Protection issues pursuant to section 19 of P.L.2009, c.60 (C.58:10C-19) or paragraph (2) of subsection a. of section 6 of P.L.1970, c.39 (C.13:1E-6);

     (h)   with respect to an area of historic fill, the person has demonstrated pursuant to a preliminary assessment and site investigation, that hazardous substances have not been discharged; and

     (i)    with respect to a properly closed sanitary landfill facility, no person who owns or controls the facility receives, has received, or will receive, with respect to such facility, any funds from any post-closure escrow account established pursuant to section 10 of P.L.1981, c.306 (C.13:1E-109) for the closure and monitoring of the facility.

     Only the person who is liable to clean up and remove the contamination pursuant to section 8 of P.L.1976, c.141 (C.58:10-23.11g) and who does not have a defense to liability pursuant to subsection d. of that section shall be liable for cleanup and removal costs.

     u.    No more than 180 days after the date of enactment of P.L.2012, c.24, the board shall complete a proceeding to establish a registration program.  The registration program shall require the owners of solar electric power generation facility projects connected to the distribution system to make periodic milestone filings with the board in a manner and at such times as determined by the board to provide full disclosure and transparency regarding the overall level of development and construction activity of those projects Statewide.

     v.    The issuance of SRECs for all solar electric power generation facility projects pursuant to this section, for projects connected to the distribution system with a capacity of one megawatt or greater, shall be deemed "Board of Public Utilities financial assistance" as provided pursuant to section 1 of P.L.2009, c.89 (C.48:2-29.47). 

     w.   No more than 270 days after the date of enactment of P.L.2012, c.24, the board shall, after notice and opportunity for public comment and public hearing, complete a proceeding to consider whether to establish a program to provide, to owners of solar electric power generation facility projects certified by the board as being three megawatts or greater in capacity and being net metered, including facilities which are owned or operated by an electric public utility and approved by the board pursuant to section 13 of P.L.2007, c.340 (C.48:3-98.1), a financial incentive that is designed to supplement the SRECs generated by the facility to further the goal of improving the economic competitiveness of commercial and industrial customers taking power from such projects.  If the board determines to establish such a program pursuant to this subsection, the board may establish a financial incentive to provide that the board shall issue one SREC for no less than every 750 kilowatt-hours of solar energy generated by the certified projects.  Any financial benefit realized in relation to a project owned or operated by an electric public utility and approved by the board pursuant to section 13 of P.L.2007, c.340 (C.48:3-98.1), as a result of the provisions of a financial incentive established by the board pursuant to this subsection, shall be credited to ratepayers.

     x.    Solar electric power generation facility projects that are located on an existing or proposed commercial, retail, industrial, municipal, professional, recreational, transit, commuter, entertainment complex, multi-use, or mixed-use parking lot with a capacity to park 350 or more vehicles where the area to be utilized for the facility is paved, or an impervious surface may be owned or operated by an electric public utility and may be approved by the board pursuant to section 13 of P.L.2007, c.340 (C.48:3-98.1).

(cf:  P.L.2018, c.17, s.2)

 

     2.  This act shall take effect immediately.

 

 

STATEMENT

 

     This bill would amend provisions in current law concerning limits on costs to customers of the Class I renewable energy requirements, solar renewable energy portfolio standards, solar renewable energy certificates (SRECs), solar alternative compliance payments (SACPs), and net metering.

     Under current law, the Board of Public Utilities (“board”) is required to ensure that the cost to customers of the Class I renewable energy requirement imposed pursuant to law does not exceed nine percent of the total paid for electricity by all customers in the State for energy year 2019, energy year 2020, and energy year 2021, respectively, and seven percent of the total paid for electricity by all customers in the State in any energy year thereafter.  This bill would revise this cap on the cost to customers by establishing a schedule for energy year 2022 through energy year 2037.  Under the schedule set forth in the bill, the cost to customers of the Class I renewable energy requirement imposed pursuant to law would not exceed nine percent of the total paid for electricity by all customers in the State for energy year 2021, and would decrease until energy year 2036 when it would not exceed five percent of the total paid for electricity by all customers in the State. 

     Current law provides that an electric power supplier or basic generation service provider may satisfy the Class I renewable energy requirements set forth in law by participating in a renewable energy trading program approved by the board in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection.  Under this bill, an electric power supplier or basic generation service provider would also be able to satisfy the Class I renewable energy requirements by submitting a Class I alternative compliance payment in the amount of $10 for energy year 2021 through energy year 2037.  Any Class I alternative compliance payment collected would be refunded directly to the ratepayers.

     Under current law, electric power suppliers and basic generation service providers must provide a certain percentage of their electricity from solar electric power generators.  The bill would revise the schedule set forth in P.L.2018, c.17.  Beginning in energy year 2021, under this bill, electric power suppliers and basic generation service providers would be required to provide 5.25 percent, rather than 5.1 percent.  In addition, instead of culminating in 5.1 percent in energy year 2021 and gradually decreasing thereafter until energy year 2023 as set forth in current law, this bill would establish the requirement through energy year 2037 when the required percentage would be 3.87 percent.

     Under current law, the board is required to adopt rules and regulations no later than 180 days after the effective date of P.L.2018, c.17 to close the SREC program to new applications upon the attainment of 5.1 percent of the kilowatt-hours sold in the State by each electric power supplier and each basic generation service provider from solar electric power generators connected to the distribution system.  The law further provides for the closing of the SREC program no later than June 1, 2021.  This bill would delete these provisions requiring the closing of the SREC program.

     In addition, current law requires the board to complete a study to evaluate how to modify or replace the SREC program in order to encourage the continued efficient and orderly development of solar renewable generating sources.  This bill would delete these study requirements, except that under this bill, the board would still be required to complete a study to develop megawatt targets for grid connected and distribution systems, including residential and small commercial rooftop systems, community solar systems, and large scale behind the meter systems, as a share of the overall solar energy requirement.

     Under current law, the board may authorize an electric power supplier or basic generation service provider to cease offering net metering to customers that are not already net metered whenever the total rated generating capacity owned and operated by net metering customer-generators Statewide equals 5.8 percent of the total annual kilowatt-hours sold in this State by each electric power supplier and each basic generation service provider during the prior one-year period.  This bill would increase this threshold from 5.8 percent to 15 percent.

     Lastly, the bill would revise provisions in current law regarding SACPS.  Under this bill, for energy year 2021, the SACP would be reduced from $258 to $220.51.  The bill would establish a revised schedule for SACP payments from energy year 2021 until energy year 2037 when the SACP would be $120.  The bill also would provide that any SACP payments collected would first be made available once a year in an auction format approved by the board to owners of solar electric generation facilities possessing unsold SRECs, and following the annual auction any remaining SACP payments would be refunded directly to the ratepayers by the electric public utilities.  Under current law, all SACP payments are refunded directly to the ratepayers by the electric public utilities.

DISCLAIMER: New Jersey SREC prices are volatile. Buyers and sellers of SRECs must do their own research. The above projections are subject to change as market dynamics change.

TAGS:
New JerseySRECSolar

New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Provides Guidance for Solar Transition

The New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (NJBPU) today proposed a rule to amend the Solar Renewable Energy Certificate (SREC) program. The rule proposal amends the SREC Registration Program (SRP) to include a process for the Board determining that 5.1 percent of the electricity sold in New Jersey has been attained from solar electric generation facilities. The Clean Energy Act of 2018 requires the closure of the current SREC program to new applications either when the state meets the 5.1 percent milestone or by June 2021, whichever comes first. The proposed rule will be published in the New Jersey Register with a 60-day public comment period.

 


“New Jersey’s solar program has been incredibly successful, recently surpassing 110,000 solar installations, creating an estimated 7,000 jobs, and rapidly approaching the 3 Gigawatt milestone. The state has a strong interest in seeing an effective solar program continue,” said NJBPU President Joseph L. Fiordaliso. “As we transition to a new solar program central to our goal of achieving 100 percent clean energy by 2050, we remain committed to ensuring a healthy solar market which continues to play a critical role for the benefit of all New Jersey residents.”


Under the rule proposed today, NJBPU staff would provide the Board with quarterly status reports on the progress toward the 5.1 percent threshold until it appears that this milestone will be reached within six months. Subsequently, staff will provide monthly forecasts. As soon as the 5.1 percent milestone is reached, staff will recommend the Board terminate the SRP. At that point, projects conditionally registered after October 29, 2018 which have not commenced commercial operations will not be certified as eligible to create SRECs.


The Board will publicly announce that the 5.1 percent milestone has been reached when the state’s installed solar capacity is estimated to have produced 5.1 percent of the retail sales estimated to have been sold over the previous twelve months. The Board is committed to providing an open and transparent public dialogue prior to the termination of the SREC registration program on whether Board action is necessary to ensure that the solar market in New Jersey continues to remain healthy.

 

About the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (NJBPU)

The NJBPU is a state agency and regulatory authority mandated to ensure safe, adequate and proper utility services at reasonable rates for New Jersey customers. Critical services regulated by the NJBPU include natural gas, electricity, water, wastewater, telecommunications and cable television. The Board has general oversight and responsibility for monitoring utility service, responding to consumer complaints, and investigating utility accidents. To find out more about the NJBPU, visit our web site at www.nj.gov/bpu.

 

About the New Jersey Clean Energy Program (NJCEP)

The NJCEP, established on January 22, 2003, in accordance with the Electric Discount and Energy Competition Act (EDECA), provides financial and other incentives to the State's residential customers, businesses and schools that install high-efficiency or renewable energy technologies, thereby reducing energy usage, lowering customers' energy bills and reducing environmental impacts. The program is authorized and overseen by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (NJBPU), and its website is www.NJCleanEnergy.com.

DISCLAIMER: Maryland SREC prices are volatile. Buyers and sellers of SRECs must do their own research. The above projections are subject to change as market dynamics change.

TAGS:
New JerseyPress ReleasesPublic Auctions

Maryland Law Goes into Effect Requiring 50% Renewable by 2030 with a 14.5% Solar Carve-Out

May 29, 2019

New Law

This past weekend Maryland Governor Larry Hogan did not veto the Clean Energy Jobs Act which is now law. It requires at least 50% of the electricity in Maryland be derived from Tier 1 renewable sources which are at least 14.5% in-state solar by year 2030. It provides an immediate stimulus for solar by increasing the demand in 2019 to 5.5% up from the old requirement of 1.95%

Big Win for Owners and Investors in MD Solar

This law is a boon for owners of existing solar in MD, new investors of solar and any of the associated businesses involved in the development of solar projects.

SRECs; Then and Now In MD

SREC’s are the primary funding sources for solar in MD. Flett Exchange has run a market for MD SRECs since July of 2009. At that time the goal was to obtain 2% solar by year 2022 and SREC prices on Flett Exchange were $370 for MD SRECS. During the last 10 years the price to install solar decreased significantly and the 2% goal in MD was achieved quicker than expected. The state legislature and governor in MD were unsuccessful in putting new solar growth targets into law for a few years. This resulted in a slow-down of new solar development and the prices for SRECs decreased in response. Prices for MD SRECs dropped below $30 in 2016 and traded under $10 until recently. Due to the anticipated and eventual passage of this Clean Energy Jobs Act SREC prices have moved up above $60 as of today. We provide historical pricing on our website for your reference based on our Flett Exchange Daily Settlement price. Current owners of Solar in MD are taking advantage right now and selling their SRECs as the prices rise on the Flett Exchange MD SREC spot market via immediate delivery and payment.

What’s Next for Solar in MD?

The major take-away of this new law is that it creates a strong, long-term goal for demand for SRECs which is what solar investors look for.  As opposed to other states, it takes a well-balanced approach by protecting ratepayers by way of a lower compliance payment which starts at $100 and gradually decreases to $20.23 by year 2030. This is important in that solar investors want to be confident that the mandates are less likely not to be rolled back due to rate increases. The following is a table comparing the previous solar mandates to the new ones implemented via the Clean Energy Jobs Act:

 

Old Cost Cap

New Cost Cap

Year

Old % Solar

New % Solar

$150

$100

2019

1.95%

5.5%

$125

$100

2020

2.5%

6.0%

$100

$80

2021

2.5%

7.5%

$75

$60

2022

2.5%

8.5%

$60

$45

2023

2.5%

9.5%

$50

$40

2024

2.5%

10.5%

$50

$35

2025

2.5%

11.5%

$50

$30

2026

2.5%

12.5%

$50

$25

2027

2.5%

13.5%

$50

$25

2028

2.5%

14.5%

$50

$22.50

2029

2.5%

14.5%

$50

$20.235

2030

2.5%

14.5%

 

How do you Sell SRECs if you own Solar in MD?

Flett Exchange is celebrating a decade of servicing Maryland solar owners this summer! We look forward to the next ten years and assisting our current and all future Maryland Solar investors. We offer a do-it-yourself SREC service for those who don’t mind handling the GATS meter readings and transfers. If you sign up you gain access to our exchange 24x7 for immediate transfer and payment. For those who want a hassle-free full-service brokerage we offer Flett REC Manager. We will handle all of your meter readings, SREC minting in GATS and process your sales and payments immediately upon SREC creation. We are efficient at what we do so we have low fees to match. Our goal is to help you maximize your revenues on your solar investment! Sign up for either service on our website.

www.flettexchange.com

DISCLAIMER: Maryland SREC prices are volatile. Buyers and sellers of SRECs must do their own research. The above projections are subject to change as market dynamics change.

TAGS:
MarylandSRECMaryland Clean Jobs ActSolar

Pennsylvania SREC Prices Rally due to Senate Bill 600 Introduced

The Pennsylvania Senate introduced bill 600. This bill calls for an increase in both wind and solar in the State. Here are a few highlights:
 
Fixed Alternative Compliance Payments: ACP = the fine that has to be paid for failure to procure SRECs. The old ACP was 200% of the current price. The new ACP is more clear and protects ratepayers.
 
up to May 2021 - 200% of current price
June 2021 to May 2026 = $125
June 2026 to May 2030= $100
June 2030 to .......... $5 less per year and levels out at $45
 
RPS - The amount of solar required each year:
June 2021 to May 2022 .94%
June 2022 to May 2023 1.88%
June 2023 to May 2024 2.81% 
June 2024 to May 2025 3.75% 
June 2025 to May 2026 4.50% 
June 2026 to May 2027 5.25% 
June 2027 to May 2028 6.00% 
June 2028 to May 2029 6.75% 
June 2029 to May 2030 7.50% 
 
PA SREC prices rallied in response to the introduction. We will update our customers as the bill changes and if it becomes law. The bill is shown below:
 

 


 

PRINTER'S NO.  655

 

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA

 SENATE BILL

No.

600

Session of

2019

INTRODUCED BY HAYWOOD, KILLION, SANTARSIERO, LEACH, FARNESE, HUGHES, SCHWANK, COSTA, COLLETT, FONTANA, TARTAGLIONE, KEARNEY, BLAKE, MUTH, STREET, A. WILLIAMS, SABATINA AND DINNIMAN, APRIL 29, 2019

REFERRED TO CONSUMER PROTECTION AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSURE, APRIL 29, 2019

AN ACT

 Amending the act of November 30, 2004 (P.L.1672, No.213), entitled, "An act providing for the sale of electric energy generated from renewable and environmentally beneficial sources, for the acquisition of electric energy generated from renewable and environmentally beneficial sources by electric distribution and supply companies and for the powers and duties of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission," further providing for definitions and for alternative energy portfolio standards, providing for solar photovoltaic technology requirements, for contract requirements for solar photovoltaic energy system sources, for renewable energy storage report, for energy storage deployment targets and for contracts for solar photovoltaic technologies by Commonwealth agencies and further providing for portfolio requirements in other states; and making a related repeal.

The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows:

Section 1.  The definition of "reporting period" in section 2 of the act of November 30, 2004 (P.L.1672, No.213), known as the Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards Act, is amended and the section is amended by adding definitions to read:

Section 2.  Definitions.

The following words and phrases when used in this act shall have the meanings given to them in this section unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

* * *

"Deploy" or "deployment."  To install a renewable energy storage system through a variety of mechanisms, including utility procurement, customer installation methods or other processes.

* * *

"Renewable energy storage system."  A commercially available technology, including, but not limited to, any electrochemical, thermal and electromechanical technology, that is capable of absorbing and storing electrical energy for a period of time for use at a later time, with all of the following characteristics:

(1)  The system is co-located behind the meter with a Tier I alternative energy source or behind the point of interconnection of a Tier I alternative energy source.

(2)  The system is owned or operated by any of the following:

(i)  A customer-generator.

(ii)  An electric generation supplier.

(iii)  An electric distribution company.

(iv)  A third party that is jointly owned by two or more entities specified under subparagraphs (i), (ii) and (iii).

(3)  The system is able to demonstrate that the energy

the system discharges at all hours in a given reporting year comes from the storage of electrical energy produced by the co-located Tier I alternative energy source.

["Reporting period."] "Reporting period or reporting year."  The 12-month period from June 1 through May 31. A reporting year shall be numbered according to the calendar year in which it begins and ends.

* * *

Section 2.  Section 3(a)(3), (b), (f) and (g)(2) of the act are amended and the section is amended by adding a subsection to read:

Section 3.  Alternative energy portfolio standards.

(a)  General compliance and cost recovery.--

* * *

(3)  All costs for:

(i)  the purchase of electricity generated from alternative energy sources, including the costs of the regional transmission organization, in excess of the regional transmission organization real-time locational marginal pricing, or its successor, at the delivery point of the alternative energy source for the electrical production of the alternative energy sources; and

(ii)  payments for alternative energy credits, in both cases that are voluntarily acquired by an electric distribution company during the cost recovery period on behalf of its customers shall be deferred as a regulatory asset by the electric distribution company and fully recovered, with a return on the unamortized balance, pursuant to an automatic energy adjustment clause under 66 Pa.C.S. § 1307 (relating to sliding scale of rates; adjustments) as a cost of generation supply under 66 Pa.C.S. § 2807 (relating to duties of electric distribution companies) in the first year after the expiration of its cost-recovery period. After the cost-recovery period, any direct or indirect costs for the purchase by electric distribution companies of resources to comply with this section, including, but not limited to, the purchase of electricity generated from alternative energy sources, payments for alternative energy credits, cost of credits banked, payments to any third party administrators for performance under this act and costs levied by a regional transmission organization to ensure that alternative energy sources are reliable, shall be recovered on a full and current basis pursuant to an automatic energy adjustment clause under 66 Pa.C.S. § 1307 as a cost of generation supply under 66 Pa.C.S. § 2807.

(b)  Tier I and solar photovoltaic shares through the 15th reporting year.--

(1)  Two years after the effective date of this act, at least 1.5% of the electric energy sold by an electric distribution company or electric generation supplier to retail electric customers in this Commonwealth shall be generated from Tier I alternative energy sources. Except as provided in this section, the minimum percentage of electric energy required to be sold to retail electric customers from alternative energy sources shall increase to 2% three years after the effective date of this act. The minimum percentage of electric energy required to be sold to retail electric customers from alternative energy sources shall increase by at least 0.5% each year so that at least 8% of the electric energy sold by an electric distribution company or electric generation supplier to retail electric customers in that certificated territory in the 15th reporting year after the effective date of this subsection is sold from Tier I alternative energy resources.

(2)  [The] Through the 15th reporting year ending May 31, 2021, the total percentage of the electric energy sold by an electric distribution company or electric generation supplier to retail electric customers in this Commonwealth that must be sold from solar photovoltaic technologies is:

(i)  0.0013% for June 1, 2006, through May 31, 2007.

(ii)  0.0030% for June 1, 2007, through May 31, 2008.

(iii)  0.0063% for June 1, 2008, through May 31, 2009.

(iv)  0.0120% for June 1, 2009, through May 31, 2010.

(v)  0.0203% for June 1, 2010, through May 31, 2011.

(vi)  0.0325% for June 1, 2011, through May 31, 2012.

(vii)  0.0510% for June 1, 2012, through May 31, 2013.

(viii)  0.0840% for June 1, 2013, through May 31, 2014.

(ix)  0.1440% for June 1, 2014, through May 31, 2015.

(x)  0.2500% for June 1, 2015, through May 31, 2016.

(xi)  0.2933% for June 1, 2016, through May 31, 2017.

(xii)  0.3400% for June 1, 2017, through May 31, 2018.

(xiii)  0.3900% for June 1, 2018, through May 31, 2019.

(xiv)  0.4433% for June 1, 2019, through May 31, 2020.

(xv)  0.5000% for June 1, 2020, [and thereafter.] through May 31, 2021.

(3)  Upon commencement of the beginning of the 6th reporting year, the commission shall undertake a review of the compliance by electric distribution companies and electric generation suppliers with the requirements of this act. The review shall also include the status of alternative energy technologies within this Commonwealth and the capacity to add additional alternative energy resources. [The commission shall use the results of this review to recommend to the General Assembly additional compliance goals beyond year 15.] The commission shall work with the department in evaluating the future alternative energy resource potential.

(b.1)  Tier I and solar photovoltaic shares beginning in the 16th reporting year.--

(1)  Each electric distribution company and electric generation supplier shall purchase, at a minimum, an amount of Tier I alternative energy credits equal to the percentage of electric energy required to be sold by an electric distribution company or electric generation supplier to retail electric customers from Tier I alternative energy sources for that reporting year and as provided under this subsection. Beginning in the 16th reporting year commencing on June 1, 2021, the minimum percentage of electric energy required to be sold by an electric distribution company or electric generation supplier to retail electric customers in this Commonwealth from Tier I alternative energy sources for each reporting year is:

(i)  10.444% for June 1, 2021, through May 31, 2022.

(ii)  12.888% for June 1, 2022, through May 31, 2023.

(iii)  15.332% for June 1, 2023, through May 31, 2024.

(iv)  17.776% for June 1, 2024, through May 31, 2025.

(v)  20.220% for June 1, 2025, through May 31, 2026.

(vi)  22.664% for June 1, 2026, through May 31, 2027.

(vii)  25.108% for June 1, 2027, through May 31, 2028.

(viii)  27.552% for June 1, 2028, through May 31, 2029.

(ix)  30% for June 1, 2029, through May 31, 2030, and thereafter.

(2)  (i)  Beginning in the 16th reporting year commencing on June 1, 2021, the minimum percentage of the electric energy sold by an electric distribution company or electric generation supplier to retail electric customers in this Commonwealth that must be sold from solar photovoltaic technologies that are owned and operated by customer-generators is:

(A)  0.65% for June 1, 2021, through May 31, 2022.

(B)  0.82% for June 1, 2022, through May 31, 2023.

(C)  0.98% for June 1, 2023, through May 31, 2024.

(D)  1.13% for June 1, 2024, through May 31, 2025.

(E)  1.30% for June 1, 2025, through May 31, 2026.

(F)  1.5% for June 1, 2026, through May 31, 2027.

(G)  1.78% for June 1, 2027, through May 31, 2028.

(H)  2.11% for June 1, 2028, through May 31, 2029.

(I)  2.5% for June 1, 2029, through May 31, 2030, and thereafter.

(ii)  For purposes of the requirements under subparagraph (i), solar photovoltaic technologies that are owned and operated by customer-generators shall include any of the following:

(A)  Solar photovoltaic technologies that were certified before or on May 31, 2021, under subsection (b)(2) and qualify to generate solar alternative energy credits in accordance with section 3.1.

(B)  Solar photovoltaic technologies that qualify as customer-generators certified under subsection (b)(2).

(3)  Beginning in the 16th reporting year commencing on June 1, 2021, and each reporting year thereafter, a solar photovoltaic system that is certified before or on May 31, 2021, provided the system meets the requirements under section 3.1, shall be included in the percentage of the required solar photovoltaic energy systems owned and operated by customer-generators under paragraph (2).

(4)  A solar photovoltaic energy system owned and operated by a customer-generator in accordance with paragraph (2) shall remain eligible to receive solar alternative energy credits for no more than 15 years beginning on June 1, 2021, or 15 years beginning on the date of the solar photovoltaic energy system's certification if the certification occurs after June 1, 2021. Upon expiration of the 15-year period specified under this paragraph, the solar photovoltaic energy system shall be eligible for alternative energy credits provided for Tier I alternative energy sources under paragraph (1).

(5)  Beginning in the 16th reporting year commencing on June 1, 2021, the minimum percentage of the electric energy sold by an electric distribution company or electric generation supplier to retail electric customers in this Commonwealth that must be sold from solar photovoltaic technologies from non-customer-generators is:

(i)  0.94% for June 1, 2021, through May 31, 2022.

(ii)  1.88% for June 1, 2022, through May 31, 2023.

(iii)  2.81% for June 1, 2023, through May 31, 2024.

(iv)  3.75% for June 1, 2024, through May 31, 2025.

(v)  4.50% for June 1, 2025, through May 31, 2026.

(vi)  5.25% for June 1, 2026, through May 31, 2027.

(vii)  6.00% for June 1, 2027, through May 31, 2028.

(viii)  6.75% for June 1, 2028, through May 31, 2029.

(ix)  7.5% for June 1, 2029, through May 31, 2030, and thereafter.

(6)  No later than one year after the effective date of this subsection, the commission shall establish regulations to ensure diversification across all customer-generators under paragraph (2), including, but not limited to, solar photovoltaic systems that are interconnected at residential or commercial locations or customer-generators whose systems are for virtual meter aggregation.

(7)  This subsection shall not apply to the certification of a solar photovoltaic energy system with a contract for the sale and purchase of alternative energy credits derived from solar photovoltaic energy sources entered into before or on May 31, 2021, provided that the system meets the requirements under section 3.1.

(8)  This subsection shall apply to a contract for the sale and purchase of alternative energy credits derived from solar photovoltaic energy sources entered into or renewed for reporting years commencing after May 31, 2021.

* * *

(f)  Alternative compliance payment.--

(1)  At the end of each program reporting year, the program administrator shall provide a report to the commission and to each covered electric distribution company showing their status level of alternative energy acquisition.

(2)  The commission shall conduct a review of each determination made under subsections (b), (b.1) and (c). If, after notice and hearing, the commission determines that an electric distribution company or electric generation supplier has failed to comply with subsections (b), (b.1) and (c), the commission shall impose an alternative compliance payment on that electric distribution company or electric generation supplier.

(3)  [The] Through May 31, 2021, the alternative compliance payment, with the exception of the solar photovoltaic share compliance requirement set forth in subsection (b)(2), shall be $45 times the number of additional alternative energy credits needed in order to comply with subsection (b) or (c).

(4)  [The] Through May 31, 2021, the alternative compliance payment for the solar photovoltaic share required under subsection (b)(2) shall be 200% of the average market value of solar renewable energy credits sold during the reporting period within the service region of the regional transmission organization, including, where applicable, the levelized up-front rebates received by sellers of solar [renewable] alternative energy credits in other jurisdictions in the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. transmission organization (PJM) or its successor.

(4.1)  Beginning June 1, 2021, the alternative compliance payment, with the exception of the customer-generator solar photovoltaic share compliance requirement specified under subsection (b.1)(2), shall be $45 multiplied by the number of additional alternative energy credits needed in order to comply with subsection (b.1) or (c).

(4.2)  Beginning June 1, 2021, the alternative compliance payment for the customer-generator solar photovoltaic share compliance requirement specified under subsection (b.1)(2) shall be as follows:

(i)  An amount equal to the product of $125 multiplied by the number of additional alternative energy credits required to comply with subsection (b.1)(2) from June 1, 2021, through May 31, 2026.

(ii)  An amount equal to the product of $100 multiplied by the number of additional alternative energy credits required to comply with subsection (b.1)(2) from June 1, 2026, through May 31, 2030.

(iii)  Beginning with the reporting year commencing on June 1, 2030, and each reporting year thereafter, the alternative compliance payment required for solar photovoltaic energy systems under subsection (b.1)(2) shall decrease by $5 from the previous reporting year until the alternative compliance payment is

$45.

(5)  The commission shall establish a process to provide for, at least annually, a review of the alternative energy market within this Commonwealth and the service territories of the regional transmission organizations that manage the transmission system in any part of this Commonwealth. The commission will use the results of this study to identify any needed changes to the cost associated with the alternative compliance payment program. If the commission finds that the costs associated with the alternative compliance payment program must be changed, the commission shall present these findings to the General Assembly for legislative enactment.

(g)  Transfer [to sustainable development funds] of alternative compliance payments.--

* * *

(2)  The alternative compliance payments shall be utilized solely for [projects] any of the following:

(i)  Projects that will increase the amount of electric energy generated from alternative energy resources for purposes of compliance with subsections (b), (b.1) and (c).

(ii)  Workforce development programs to train workers in renewable energy industries.

* * *

Section 3.  The act is amended by adding sections to read:

Section 3.1.  Solar photovoltaic technology requirements.

(a)  System requirements.--Notwithstanding section 4, in order to qualify as an alternative energy source eligible to meet the solar photovoltaic share of the compliance requirements under section 3, a solar photovoltaic system must do one of the following:

(1)  Directly deliver the electricity that the solar photovoltaic system generates to a retail customer of an electric distribution company or to the distribution system operated by an electric distribution company operating in this Commonwealth and currently obligated to meet the compliance requirements specified under section 3.

(2)  Directly connect to the electric system of an electric cooperative or municipal electric system operating in this Commonwealth.

(3)  Directly connect to the electric transmission system at a location within the service territory of an electric distribution company operating in this Commonwealth.

(b)  Construction.--

(1)  Nothing under this section or section 4 shall be construed to affect any of the following:

(i)  A certification originating in this Commonwealth and granted before the effective date of this section of a solar photovoltaic energy generator as a qualifying alternative energy source eligible to meet the solar photovoltaic share of this Commonwealth's alternative energy portfolio compliance requirements under section 3.

(ii)  A certification of a solar photovoltaic system with a binding written contract for the sale and purchase of alternative energy credits derived from solar photovoltaic energy sources entered into before October 30, 2017.

(2)  This section shall apply to contracts entered into or renewed on or after October 30, 2017.

Section 3.2.  Contract requirements for solar photovoltaic energy system sources.

(a)  Low-cost procurement for non-customer-generators.--

(1)  To assure the lowest-cost procurement, two-thirds of the annual total percentage requirement from solar photovoltaic sources as specified under section 3(b.1)(5) shall be procured through contracts of no less than 12 years and no more than 20 years for both energy and alternative energy credits required under this subsection. Energy procured to satisfy the requirements of this subsection may not be used to satisfy the procurement requirement under subsection (b).

(2)  An electric distribution company with more than one million annual megawatt hours of retail load shall:

(i)  procure energy and alternative energy credits based on the total electric energy sold to all customers in the electric distribution company's service territory, without regard to whether the supplier of the retail sales is the electric distribution company or an electric generation supplier;

(ii)  issue annual requests for proposals for competitive long-term procurement of solar energy and alternative energy credits and enter into contracts in compliance with this subsection in accordance with regulations established by the commission; and

(iii)  be entitled to a presumption of prudency and full cost recovery in distribution rates of payments for competitive procurements made under this subsection at a levelized price over the term of the contract of less than one-half of the applicable alternative compliance payment.

(3)  For purposes of any true-up required under this subsection, the following apply:

(i)  If contracts executed to meet the requirements of this section fail to deliver the quantities required in any given year, the electric distribution company shall procure alternative energy credits during the true-up period established under section 3(e)(5).

(ii)  Electric generation suppliers in the territory of the electric distribution company shall not have an obligation to purchase alternative energy credits for the share of the requirements under this section and shall not be responsible for true-up or the payment of any penalty for failure to comply with this section.

(4)  No later than December 1, 2020, the commission shall establish regulations to implement the requirements under this subsection and provide for the issuance and execution of the first competitive procurement contracts for the supply of alternative energy credits beginning with the reporting year commencing on June 1, 2021. The regulations shall address, but not be limited to, all of the following:

(i)  Competitive contract procurement.

(ii)  Alternative energy credit retirement.

(iii)  Guidance on the prudency of proposed purchases, including a presumption of prudence if the annualized cost of alternative energy credits is less than one-half of the applicable alternative compliance payment.

(iv)  Competitiveness review using standard industry practices to ensure that each solicitation is competitive and providing for the prompt re-issuance of a solicitation deemed to be uncompetitive.

(v)  Cost recovery for electric distribution companies for prudent and competitive contracts.

(vi)  Alternative energy credit true-up of procurement shortfalls in subsequent year contract procurements.

(b)  Low-cost procurement for Tier I resources.--

(1)  No later than December 1, 2020, the commission shall establish regulations providing for competitive procurement of at least one-sixth of the Tier I alternative energy required under section 3(b.1)(1), except for energy procured  under subsection (a), under contracts with a term of no less than 10 years and no more than 15 years beginning with the reporting year commencing on June 1, 2021. The competitive procurements under this subsection shall result in contracts for both energy and alternative energy credits for Tier I alternative energy resources for the purpose of satisfying the requirements under section

(3)(b.1)(1). The requirements under this paragraph shall not apply to the solar photovoltaic share requirements under section 3(b.1)(2) or (5).

(2)  In establishing regulations under paragraph (1), the commission shall collaborate with stakeholders, including, but not limited to, the department, energy generation suppliers, renewable energy developers and electric distribution companies, and determine the benefit to electric customers in this Commonwealth based on the following factors:

(i)  The savings to electric customers resulting from the procurement of alternative energy credits under this section.

(ii)  The preference for new generation resources with reduced emissions as determined by the department.

(iii)  The parties to the contracts.

(iv)  The design of the competitive procurement process.

(v)  The terms to be included in the contracts based on commercial reasonableness for the parties to the contracts.

Section 3.3.  Renewable energy storage report.

(a)  Report.--No later than one year after the effective date of this section, the commission, in consultation with the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. transmission organization (PJM) or its successor and stakeholders, including, but not limited to, third-party electric generation suppliers and electric utilities, shall conduct a renewable energy storage analysis and submit a report to the Governor and General Assembly concerning renewable energy storage needs and opportunities and costs and benefits in this Commonwealth.

(b)  Contract.--The commission shall contract with an independent consultant selected through a competitive request for proposal process to produce the report under this section.

(c)  Report.--At a minimum, the commission shall compile the report in the following manner:

(1)  Use 2,000 megawatt hours of renewable energy storage as a benchmark target goal.

(2)  Identify and measure the potential costs and benefits of deployment based on all of the following factors:

(i)  Deferred investments in generation, transmission and distribution facilities.

(ii)  Reduced ancillary services costs.

(iii)  Reduced transmission and distribution congestion.

(iv)  Reduced peak power costs and capacity costs.

(v)  Reduced costs for emergency power supplies during outages.

(vi)  Curtailment of nonrenewable energy generators to meet peak demand.

(vii)  Reduced greenhouse gas emissions.

(3)  Analyze and estimate all of the following:

(i)  The ability to integrate renewable energy resources with energy storage systems.

(ii)  The benefits of coupling the storage to meet peak demand.

(iii)  The impact of renewable energy storage on grid reliability and power quality.

(iv)  The impact on retail electric rates over the useful life of a renewable energy storage system compared to the same services using other facilities or resources.

(4)  Consider whether the implementation of renewable electric energy storage systems would promote the use of electric vehicles in this Commonwealth and the potential impact on renewable energy production in this Commonwealth.

(5)  Analyze the types of renewable energy storage technologies currently being implemented in this Commonwealth and other states.

(6)  Consider the benefits and costs to retail electric customers in this Commonwealth, political subdivisions and electric public utilities associated with the development and implementation of additional renewable energy storage technologies.

(7)  Determine the optimal amount of renewable energy storage that should be added in this Commonwealth during the next five years to provide the maximum benefit to retail electric customers in this Commonwealth.

(8)  Determine the optimum points of entry into the electric distribution system for distributed energy resources.

(9)  Calculate the cost to retail electric customers in this Commonwealth of adding the optimal amount of renewable energy storage.

Section 3.4.  Energy storage deployment targets.

(a)  Determination.--No later than 90 days after completion of the report under section 3.3, the commission shall determine appropriate energy storage deployment targets that each electric distribution company needs to achieve by December 31, 2025, including any interim targets. In making the determination, the commission  shall consider all of the following:

(1)  The contents of the report under section 3.3.

(2)  Adopting specific subcategories of deployment by point of interconnection.

(3)  Adopting requirements or processes for all of the following:

(i)  The competitive deployment of energy storage services from third parties.

(ii)  The direct purchase of storage devices.

(4)  Appropriate accountability mechanisms, including  reporting requirements, for investor-owned electric utilities to procure energy storage in sufficient quantities to meet the targets established by the commission.

(5)  If advised by the report under section 3.3, creating a renewable peak standard that would set targets for meeting peak demand with renewable energy co-located with storage, including all of the following:

(i)  Demand response technology or energy storage that is paired solely with a Tier I alternative energy source that generates, dispatches or discharges energy to an electric distribution system during seasonal peak periods as determined by the commission or reduce load on the system.

(ii)  Renewable energy storage systems that can be co-located with the Tier I alternative energy sources or paired virtually, as long as the storage facility is within the boundaries of the same electric distribution company's service territory and specifically located to reduce peak demand.

(b)  Definitions.--As used in this section, the term "procure" shall mean to acquire by ownership a renewable energy storage system or a contractual right to use the energy from, or the capacity of, a renewable energy storage system.

Section 3.5.  Contracts for solar photovoltaic technologies by Commonwealth agencies.

(a)  Public works.--Except as provided under subsection (b), a Commonwealth agency shall require that a contract for the construction, reconstruction, alteration, repair, improvement or maintenance of public works contain a provision that, if any solar photovoltaic technologies to be used or supplied in the performance of the contract, only solar photovoltaic technologies manufactured in the United States shall be used or supplied in the performance of the contract or any subcontracts under the contract.

(b)  Exception.--The requirement under subsection (a) shall not apply if the head of the Commonwealth agency, in writing, determines that the solar photovoltaic technologies are not manufactured in the United States in sufficient quantities to meet the requirements of the contract.

(c)  Definitions.--As used in this section, the term "public work" shall have the same meaning given to it in section 2(5) of the act of August 15, 1961 (P.L.987, No.442), known as the Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Act.

Section 4.  Section 4 of the act is amended to read:

Section 4.  Portfolio requirements in other states.

If an electric distribution [supplier] company or electric generation [company] supplier provider sells electricity in any other state and is subject to [renewable] alternative energy portfolio requirements in that state, they shall list any such requirement and shall indicate how it satisfied those [renewable] alternative energy portfolio requirements. To prevent double-counting, the electric distribution [supplier] company or electric generation [company] supplier shall not satisfy Pennsylvania's alternative energy portfolio requirements using alternative energy used to satisfy another state's portfolio requirements or alternative energy credits already purchased by individuals, businesses or government bodies that do not have a compliance obligation under this act unless the individual, business or government body sells those credits to the electric distribution company or electric generation supplier. Energy derived from alternative energy sources inside the geographical boundaries of this Commonwealth shall be eligible to meet the compliance requirements under this act. Energy derived from alternative energy sources located outside the geographical boundaries of this Commonwealth but within the service territory of a regional transmission organization that manages the transmission system in any part of this Commonwealth shall only be eligible to meet the compliance requirements of electric distribution companies or electric generation suppliers located within the service territory of the same regional transmission organization. For purposes of compliance with this act, alternative energy sources located in the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. regional transmission organization (PJM) or its successor service territory shall be eligible to fulfill compliance obligations of all Pennsylvania electric distribution companies and electric generation suppliers. Energy derived from alternative energy sources located outside the service territory of a regional transmission organization that manages the transmission system in any part of this Commonwealth shall not be eligible to meet the compliance requirements of this act. Electric distribution companies and electric generation suppliers shall document that this energy was not used to satisfy another state's [renewable] alternative energy portfolio standards.

Section 5.  Repeals are as follows:

(1)  The General Assembly declares that the repeal under paragraph (2) is necessary to effectuate the addition of section 3.1 of the act.

(2)  Section 2804 of the act of April 9, 1929 (P.L.177, No.175), known as The Administrative Code of 1929, is repealed.

Section 6.  This act shall take effect immediately.

DISCLAIMER: Pennsylvania SREC prices are volatile. Buyers and sellers of SRECs must do their own research. The above projections are subject to change as market dynamics change.

TAGS:
PennsylvaniaPress ReleasesSREC

Maryland House and Senate Pass Renewable Energy Legislation

The Maryland House passed renewable energy legislation that was passed by the senate in March. It now moves to Governor Larry Hogans' desk to be signed into law.
 
It calls for a 50% RPS with a 14.5% solar carve-out. 
 

DISCLAIMER: Maryland SREC prices are volatile. Buyers and sellers of SRECs must do their own research. The above projections are subject to change as market dynamics change.

TAGS:
MarylandPress ReleasesSREC

Pennsylvania Nuclear Bailout Bill Could Help PA Solar

Pennsylvania Nuclear Bailout Bill Could Help PA Solar
 
Pennsylvania lawmakers are crafting a bill that would provide subsidies to keep nuclear plants open. The nuclear plants are not able to cover expenses because power prices on the wholesale market have dropped over the past few years. This is due to the large amount of natural gas brought to market. Cheap gas has already caused the mass closure of Coal plants in areas of the country. 
 
The closure of the Nuclear plants will be devastating because they provide Co2 free electricity. 5 nuclear plants provide 42% of Pennsylvania electricity.
 
It is expected that the Nuclear bill will include increased incentives for renewable energy. This happened in New Jersey in May 2018.  
 
Depending upon the details of the bill, solar owners may see their SREC prices rise. The article in the Pocono Record gives some details.
 

DISCLAIMER: Pennsylvania SREC prices are volatile. Buyers and sellers of SRECs must do their own research. The above projections are subject to change as market dynamics change.

TAGS:
PennsylvaniaSREC

New Jersey BPU Solar Transition Straw Proposal

The Staff of the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (“BPU”) invites all interested parties and members of the public to participate in the continued public stakeholder process to fully inform the design of the New Jersey solar transition required by P.L. 2018, c.17 (the “Clean Energy Act”). This process will include the comments and input received previously, and will build upon the experience of the State and of other jurisdictions. Likewise, this approach is intended to be completed by the statutory deadline, and to provide stakeholders the certainty necessary for continued success for the solar industry.

On May 23, 2018, Governor Phil Murphy signed the Clean Energy Act, which directs the BPU to:

adopt rules and regulations to close the [Solar Renewable Energy Certificate] SREC program to new applications upon the attainment of 5.1 percent of the kilowatt-hours sold in the State by each electric power supplier and each basic generation provider from solar electric power generators connected to the distribution system. The board shall continue to consider any application filed before the date of enactment of P.L.2018, c.17. The board shall provide for an orderly and transparent mechanism that will result in the closing of the existing SREC program on a date certain but no later than June 1,2021.

Additionally, the Clean Energy Act directs the Board of Public Utilities to:

 

 
 

1Not a Paid Legal Advertisement


complete a study that evaluates how to modify or replace the SREC program to encourage the continued efficient and orderly development of solar renewable energy generating sources throughout theState.

Furthermore, the Clean Energy Act mandates that:

the board shall ensure that the cost to customers of the Class I renewable energy requirement imposed pursuant to this subsection shall not exceed nine percent of the total paid for electricity by all customers in the State for energy year 2019, energy year 2020, and energy year 2021, respectively, and shall not exceed seven percent of the total paid for electricity by all customers in the State in any energy year thereafter. In calculating the cost to customers of the Class I renewable energy  requirement imposed pursuant to this subsection, the board shall not include the costs of the offshore wind energy certificate program established pursuant to paragraph (4) of this subsection. The board shall take any steps necessary to prevent the exceedance of the cap on the cost to customers including, but not limited to, adjusting the Class I renewable energyrequirement.

 

 

SREC Transition Principles

Staff will be guided by the following “SREC Transition Principles”:

1.     Provide maximum benefit to ratepayers at the lowestcost;

2.     Support the continued growth of the solarindustry;

3.     Ensure that prior investments retainvalue;

4.     Meet the Governor’s commitment of 50% Class I Renewable Energy Certificates (“RECs”) by 2030 and 100% clean energy by2050;

5.     Provide insight and information to stakeholders through a transparent process for developing the Solar Transition and SuccessorProgram;

6.     Comply fully with the statute, including the implications of the cost cap;and

7.     Provide disclosure and notification to developers that certain projects may not be guaranteed participation in the current SREC program, and continue updates on market conditions via the New Jersey Clean Energy Program (“NJCEP”) SREC Registration Program (“SRP”) Solar ActivityReports.

 

 

Program Assumptions and Overview

The Clean Energy Act defines the transition point as “the attainment of 5.1 percent of the kilowatt-hours sold in the State by each electric power supplier and each basic generation provider from solar electric power generators connected to the distribution system.” For purposes of this proposal, “attainment” means that 5.1% of the actual kilowatt-hours sold in the state are being generated by solar electric power generators. This will result in the following categorization ofSRECs:


·       Legacy SRECs: SRECs created by projects that filed an SRP Registration and entered into operation prior to the attainment of the 5.1% transitionpoint.

·       Pipeline SRECs: SRECs created by projects that filed an SRP Registration but which have not entered into commercial operation prior to the attainment of the 5.1% transition point.

·       Successor SRECs: SRECs created by projects that filed an SRP Registration (or replacement mechanism) after the attainment of the 5.1% transitionpoint.

o The SREC Successor Program is the program for the allocation and valuation of Successor SRECs. The current SREC program is designated as “current SREC program”.

In this proposal, SREC Transition (or Solar Transition) is defined as those steps necessary for the definition of the 5.1% transition point; the treatment of Legacy SRECs; the treatment of Pipeline SRECs; and the treatment of Successor SRECs.

Stakeholder Process

Working within these principles and assumptions, Board Staff wishes to bring together all interested stakeholders, beginning in January, for a full discussion of the benefits and liabilities of the different approaches to developing and implementing a SREC Transition in compliance with statutory requirements.

Staff would like to set forth the following proposed schedule for the process of developing the SREC Transition process:

Dec 2018:                               Staff releases Solar Transition Straw Proposal Jan – Feb2019:                             Stakeholder meetings on the StrawProposal

April –July2019:                   Working groups & workshops conducted onspecific

elements of the Transition

Aug – Sept2019:                    Rule proposal presented toBoard

Sept – Nov2019:                    Public comment period on rule proposal Dec 2019:                                       Amendments to ruleproposal

Jan – Feb2020:                      Public comment period on rule proposal March 2020:                            Rule adopted byBoard

 

The first Solar Transition Stakeholder Meeting will be held:

Date:        Friday, January 18,2019

Location: Rutgers University College Avenue Student Center 126 College Ave, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 Multipurpose Room, 2nd Floor.

Time:       10a.m.

 

Stakeholders wishing to speak are asked to register in advance to solar.transitions@bpu.nj.gov no later than 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, January 16, 2019. Stakeholders wishing to speak without prior registration will be allowed to sign up to do so upon arrival to the Stakeholder Meeting, and will be called to speak following the preregisteredspeakers.

Additional stakeholder meetings will be announced subsequently.

Written comments are also encouraged and must be submitted to Aida Camacho-Welch, Secretary, New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, Post Office Box 350, Trenton, New Jersey,


08625. Written comments may also be submitted electronically to solar.transitions@bpu.nj.gov in PDF or Microsoft Word format. All comments must be received on or before 5:00 p.m. on Friday, February 22, 2019. Please note that these comments may be considered “public documents” for purposes of the State’s Open Public Records Act. Stakeholders may identify information that they wish to keep confidential by submitting them in accordance with the confidentiality procedures set forth in N.J.A.C.14:1-12.3.

 

 

Request for Comments

In light of the statutory directives and the SREC Transition Principles, Staff invites stakeholders to submit comments on the SREC Transition and SREC Successor Program. Additionally, Staff seeks detailed comments on the following issues and questions.

Board Staff strongly requests that stakeholders submit quantitative information to support any assertions pertaining to numerical aspects of the SREC Transition and the SREC Successor Program. Stakeholders are therefore highly encouraged to include, as part of any comments, any calculations, graphs, and tables that are relevant and illustrative to the content of the comments. The calculations, graphs or tables must include an attachment which  clearly explains all assumptions used and a copy of any data employed (in a Microsoft Excel file or other easily shared data tool). Stakeholders may identify information that they wish to keep confidentialbysubmittingtheminaccordancewiththeconfidentialityproceduressetforthin

N.J.A.C. 14:1-12.3.

In addition to the below question, Staff also wishes to set forth the following proposal for discussion and consideration:

·       Defining attainment as being met when 5.1% of the actual kilowatt-hours sold in the  state come from solar electric powergenerators.

 

·       Recognizing that, based on the definitions proposed above, Pipeline SRECs are those projects that have filed an SRP Registration but have not entered into commercial operation prior to the attainment of the 5.1% trigger. Recognizing that those Pipeline SRECs will not be used for satisfaction of the RPS of the Legacy SRECs, in order to ensure that the current market does not becomeover-supplied.

 

·       Developing a process whereby the Pipeline SRECs are eligible for either a transitional program or able to roll into the SREC Successor Program, as developed. As part of the design process, the Board would consider how to ensure that Pipeline SRECs are considered and provided value (including whether to develop a separate program for Pipeline SRECs, or roll those Pipeline SRECs into the SREC Successor Program, as developed).

 

·       Over an 18-month period, closely monitor the price cap to ensure that it is not exceeded, with the recognition that the Board could exercise its authority to reduce the Class I RECs in the event of the cap beingexceeded.

With that in mind, Staff presents the following questions for consideration and discussion:


1)    In your direct experience, how has the current SREC program functioned over the past 5 years?

 

2)    How should any proposed SREC Successor Program be organized in conformance with the Clean Energy Act and Staff’s SREC Transition Principles? Please provide detailed quantitative and qualitative responses as to the perceived pros and cons of each of the followingoptions:

a.     a fixed priceSREC;

b.     a market-determined SREC;and

c.     any otheroption(s).

 

3)    Based on your response to question 2 above, provide precise quantitative and  qualitative recommendations as to how your preferred SREC Successor Program model would be implemented, keeping in mind the necessity of satisfying the “SREC Transition Principles” set forthabove.

 

4)    How should Legacy SRECs be valued? Should these Legacy SRECs be valued under the SREC Successor Program or valuedseparately?

 

5)    How should Pipeline SRECs be valued? Should these Pipeline SRECs be valued under the SREC Successor Program or valuedseparately?

a.     Should the Board continue the current SREC program as a separate program? If so,how?

b.     Should the Board include the current SREC program within the SREC Successor Program? If so,how?

 

6)    For any solar transition, should the Board set a megawatt (“MW”) target for annual new solar construction? If so, should those targets be defined as percentage of retail sales or a set MW cap? Under what circumstances and/or assumptions is this targetachievable?

 

7)    In any SREC Successor Program, should the Board seek to set annual MW capacity caps for new solar construction or percentages of retail sales? Why or why not? If yes, what should be the value through 2030 and why? If yes, should the Board seek to set differentiated capacity caps under the solar RPS based on projecttype?

 

8)    In the SREC Successor Program, should the Board provide differentiated SREC or solar value incentives to different types of projects? Should such differentiated SREC compensation be created through SREC multipliers, through an add-on valuation, or through some other method? Based on what factor(s) should any SREC compensation bedifferentiated?

 

9)    How should the cost cap be measured? Should any “head space” under the cost cap in the first years be “banked”? Why or whynot?

 

10)Can and should the cost cap be determined based on net costs that include some type of valuation of associated benefits? If so, what should those qualitative and quantitative benefitsbeandhowshouldtheybeassignedavalue?IftheBoardcanandshould


consider a net benefits test, should other cost impacts be included? Which ones? Why? If other cost impacts should not be included, whynot?

 

11)What steps should the Board take to implement the cost cap? In particular, please discuss the pros and cons of decreasing the Class I REC Renewable Portfolio Standards. Should any measures implemented differentiate among the different type of Class I renewable energy technologies? Should these measures differentiate among the different market sectors (e.g. utility-scale grid supply versus small residential systems)? Should these measures be technology neutral? Why or whynot?

 

12)Should the solar industry transition into a true, incentive-free market as the costs of solar begin to approach “grid parity be a goal, or even a consideration, of the SREC Successor Program? If so, how can a SREC Successor Program assist that transition? Should a transition also encompass changes to the net metering program (cf. ongoing FERC/PJM review of DERaggregation)?

 

13)Please provide comments on any significant issues not specifically addressed in the questions above, making specific reference to their applicability in the New Jersey context. Please do not reiterate previously madecomments.

DISCLAIMER: New Jersey SREC prices are volatile. Buyers and sellers of SRECs must do their own research. The above projections are subject to change as market dynamics change.

TAGS:
New Jersey

Implementation of New Jersey 10 Year SREC term

The Clean Energy Act, signed by Governor Murphy on May 23, 2018, included the following provision:

“For all applications for designation as connected to the distribution system of a solar electric power generation facility filed with the board after the date of enactment of P.L.2018, c.17 (C.48:3-87.8 et al.) the SREC term shall be 10 years.” L. 2018, c. 17, §2(d)(3).

At its agenda meeting earlier today, the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities clarified the language above as follows:

SRP REGISTRATIONS SUBMITTED IN THE ONLINE PORTAL ON OR BEFORE TODAY’S DEADLINE1 AND DEEMED COMPLETE WILL RECEIVE A 15-YEAR SREC QUALIFICATION LIFE.

SRP REGISTRATIONS SUBMITTED IN THE ONLINE PORTAL AFTER TODAY’S DEADLINE WILL RECEIVE A 10-YEAR SREC QUALIFICATION LIFE.

APPLICATIONS RECEIVED BY THE BOARD FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION T PRIOR TO TODAY’S DEADLINE THAT FULFILL ALL CONDITIONS ESTABLISHED BY THE BOARD SHALL RECEIVE A 15-YEAR SREC QUALIFICATION LIFE.

1 The “Deadline” is defined as 11:59:59 PM EST on October 29, 2018

Additional details are as follows:

SRP Eligibility Process

To qualify for a 15-year SREC qualification life, a registration must be submitted in the online portal (http://njcepsolar.programprocessing.com/) under the status Application Received on or before 11:59:59 PM EST on October 29, 2018 (Deadline), and:

1. Contain all the items and information identified on the SRP Checklist required to be deemed complete, or

2. Within two weeks of an email from the Program Manager/Administrator to the registrant identifying one or more minor deficiencies with the registration, successfully resolve those minor deficiencies. a. If the minor deficiencies are not successfully resolved within two weeks from the date of the email, the registration will be rejected and the registrant would be required to resubmit a new registration packet.

For the avoidance of doubt:

A. Any registrations submitted after today’s Deadline will only be eligible for a 10-year SREC qualification life.

B. Any registration submitted in the online portal under the status Application Received on or before the Deadline, but that is determined to be incomplete due to a major deficiency, will be rejected and if resubmitted after the deadline will only be eligible for a 10-year SREC qualification life.

C. Any registration submitted in the online portal under the status Application Received on or before the Deadline, but that is determined to be incomplete due to a minor deficiency, will have two weeks to successfully resolve the minor deficiencies to remain eligible for a 15-year SREC qualification life.

D. Registrations having the status Pending Uploads as of the Deadline will not be considered submitted in the online portal and therefore will not be eligible for a 15-year SREC qualification life.

 For information regarding the definition of Major/Minor Deficiencies, please see:

http://www.njcleanenergy.com/srpforms

________________________

Implementation of New Jersey 10 Year SREC term

TAGS:
New JerseySREC

DC Solar Update

The DC market has been on a downward trend, moving against fundamentals based on the new RPS. However due to the grandfathering of the old DC renewable portfolio standard (RPS) buyers are not obligated to pay over $300 per SREC for some of their obligations.   We are seeing just that happen now, lower SREC payments.  It is unknown to how much of a supply the buyers have covered at the upper, new, RPS, level vs the old.  

 The normal reaction, in a quickly dropping SREC market, of a SREC seller is to hold.  We've witnessed this in the OH, PA, NJ and MD markets and in most cases (except for NJ due to they passed legislation to correct/re-tune the RPS) it does not work.  Holding in this situation creates a potential glut of SRECs for the next energy year, the carry over of unsold SRECs, and will push pricing even lower.  New SREC sellers are calculated in at a lower SREC price and will be willing to sell at the new lower levels.

 Kevin Flett  

DISCLAIMER: This article contains forward looking statements. Actual market action could differ materially from those anticipated. Sellers of SRECs should do their own research. Actual SREC production may differ significantly from those estimates. The company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement.

TAGS:
Washington DCPress ReleasesSREC

New Jersey AB 3723 Passage and its Effect on New Jersey SREC Prices

September 2018

In May 2018 New Jersey AB 3723 was passed which instituted major changes to the New Jersey solar incentive market revolving around SRECs.

History:

New Jersey was one of the early leaders in providing ratepayer incentives through SRECs to solar owners. Flett Exchange launched its’ New Jersey SREC market in June of 2007 to help facilitate an open and competitive market. The SREC program was created to provide a long-term 15 year pay-back as opposed to the large up-front incentive program that existed in New Jersey. Solar installation costs dropped quicker than expected during the last decade. As of the fall of 2018 New Jersey has close to 100,000 solar installations and produces over 3% of its electricity from solar. A major market reform was instituted in 2012 which increased demand for solar. This increase in demand averted a collapse in in SREC prices which kept solar investors whole and provided demand for a few more years of new solar development which satisfied solar developers. This same change slashed the cost cap by more than 50% to protect ratepayers. By 2016 it was apparent that once again costs to install new solar dropped quicker than expected. AB 3723 was passed in May 2018.

 

AB 3723 major changes:

  1. Closes the current SREC program to new applicants by June 2021

  2. Mathematically attempts to close the SREC program by timing the curtailment of supply of new solar while increasing demand at the same time thus “pinning” high SREC prices for the next 10 – 15 years.

  3. Adds a 7% cost cap by 2022 that is complicated/impossible to model and relies on BPU action and will most likely not kick in for years. The cost cap favors the wind development portion of the RPS by protecting it from this cap. The solar portion will be most likely be ratcheted down through reduced solar compliance costs.

(Plain English: Bail-out legislation for current solar owners (Attempts to keep SREC prices above $200 for years) that at the same time gives solar developers 2 to 3 years to cash in on projects before a new incentive program is created. Ratepayers who pay for it will never understand it which limits/reduces political risk for passing it. Provides for costs shifting 5+ years out from solar compliance to wind compliance thus potentially reducing SREC prices at that time)

Price Projection and Risks for Sellers of New Jersey SRECs:

AB 3723 prevented the New Jersey SREC market from a collapse which was inevitable by 2019-2021 due to the pace of solar development in New Jersey which was significantly more than what the legislation called for. In all SREC markets that experienced similar events – PA, MD, OH, SREC prices dropped to $10 or less for years. It appears that SREC prices will remain at the $180 to $250 range for the next 3 to 5 years (2018 to 2020/22) Analysis for prices and hedging strategies going out 3+ years are available to our registered and active customers.

DISCLAIMER: New Jersey SREC prices are volatile. Buyers and sellers of SRECs must do their own research. The above projections are subject to change as market dynamics change.

TAGS:
New JerseySRECResearch

PA SREC UPDATE

On April 19, 2018, the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission published its interpretation of Act 40 of 2017 signed by Governor Tom Wolf on October 30th 2017 in regards to the compliance eligibility of out of state solar facilities SRECs in the Pennsylvania market.  The commission ruled that unless an out of state solar facility has a binding contract for their SRECs with a renewable portfolio standard (RPS) buyer prior to October 30th 2017 the out of state solar facility will no longer have PA state certification on their SRECs after October 30th 2017.  The SRECs generated (month of generation) prior to October 30th 2017 from an out of state solar facility will retain their PA state certification and the SRECs remain eligible for the full 3 compliance years.  RPS buyers that have a contracted with an out of state facility prior to the October 30th 2017 date have 60 days to petition for qualification with AEPS.

 

Flett Exchange intends to clear all eligible PA certified SRECs.  Out of state PA certified solar facilities intending to sell must contact us and supply proof of certification (CSV file from PJM-EIS of intended inventory to sell) for verification.

 

Link to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission’s final implementation order of Act 40 of 2017 http://www.puc.pa.gov/pcdocs/1562754.pdf 

 

-Kevin Flett, Director of Operations

 

PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17105-3265

 

Implementationof Act 40 of 2017                         

Public Meeting held April 19, 2018 2631527-LAW

Docket No. M-2017-2631527

JOINT MOTION OF CHAIRMAN GLADYS M. BROWN & VICE CHAIRMAN ANDREW G. PLACE

Before the Commission is the Final Implementation Order (Implementation Order) regarding Act 40 of 2017. Act 40, signed by Governor Tom Wolf on October 30, 2017, inter alia, amends the qualifications to certify Tier I solar photovoltaic share facilities under Pennsylvania's Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards (AEPS) Act. Numerous comments were filedin responsetotheTentativeImplementationOrder(TIO)adoptedonDecember 21,2017,in addition to the Supplemental Interpretation the Vice Chairman and I offered in our Joint Statement. These comments have provided helpful guidance, specifically regarding legislative intent,forourdeliberationsin thisproceeding;therefore,wethankallofthosewhotookthetime to help inform the record. Today, the Commission issues this Final Implementation Order to guide the AEPS marketplace toward compliance with Act40.

 

 

 

The core issues in this proceeding are the Commission's interpretations of Sections 2804(2)(i) and 2804(2)(ii). These read:

 (2)   Nothingunderthissectionorsection4ofthe"AlternativeEnergy Portfolio Standards Act" shall affect any of thefollowing:

 

 

(i)    A certification originating within the geographical boundaries of this Commonwealth granted prior to the effective date of this section of a solar photovoltaic energy generator as a qualifying alternative energy source eligible to meet the solar photovoltaic share of this Commonwealth's alternativeenergyportfoliocompliancerequirementsunderthe"Alternative Energy Portfolio StandardsAct."

 

(ii)   Certification of a solar photovoltaic system with a binding written contractforthesaleandpurchaseofalternativeenergycreditsderivedfrom solar photovoltaic energy sources entered into prior to the effective date of thissection.

 

Interpretation of these sections has been challenging for the Commission, particularly because the verbiage in Section 2804(2)(i) is not precise. The question here is whether or not this statute is intended to 'grandfather' out-of-state facilities certified before October 30, 2017, to generate


Tier I Solar credits. Given this lack of clarity, we issued a Joint Statement in conjunction with adoption of the TIO offering supplemental statutory interpretations to spur comments in an effort to inform the record.1

 

The Office of Consumer Advocate (OCA) succinctly states the challenge in interpreting Section 2804(2)(i) of Act 40.

 

The OCA submits that the language as written in Act 40 is unclear and the OCA is unable to discern the intent of the section as written. 2

 

Likewise, the comments of Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future (PennFuture) share similar sentiments as OCA, stating:

 Section 2804(2)(i) of Act 40 is ambiguous in regard to how and when the qualification of a facility as an alternative energy generator originates.3

 

We too agree that the language of Section 2804(2)(i) is unclear. Consequently, we are obligated, under the rules of statutory construction, to ascertain the intent of the General Assembly. The Rules of Statutory Construction at 1 Pa. C.S. § 1921(b) provide that:

When the words of a statute are clear and free from all ambiguity, the letter of it is not to be disregarded under the pretext of pursuing its spirit.

 

Since, as the OCA and PennFuture point out, the verbiage here is unclear, we must now refer to 1 Pa. C.S. § 1921(c) which provides:

When the words of a statute are not explicit, the intention of the General Assembly may be ascertained by considering, among other matters:

 (2)  The circumstances under which it wasenacted.

(3)  The mischief to beremedied.

(4)  The object to beattained.

 

(6)  The consequences of a particularinterpretation

(7)  The contemporaneous legislativehistory.

(8)  Legislativeandadministrativeinterpretationsofsuchstatute.

 

The comments filed in response to the TIO have proven instructive in regard to why the General Assembly drafted this legislation, why the Governor signed it into law, and the mischief to be remedied.

 

 

 
 

1 Joint Statement of Chairman Gladys M. Brown and Vice Chairman Andrew G. Place entered December 21, 2017 at the instant Docket.

2 Comments ofOCA at page 5 filed February 5, 2018.

3 Comments of PennFuture at page I filed January 18, 2018.


Comments filed by Governor Tom Wolf, Senators Mario M. Scavello, Tom Killion, John

T. Yudichak, Jay Costa, John M. DiSanto, Steward J. Greenleaf, David G. Argall, Wayne D. Fontana, Guy Reschenthaler, and Representatives Michael B. Carroll, Eric M. Roe, Ronald S. Marsico, and Sue Helm are particularly insightful. As lawmakers who effectuated Act 40, these commenters are uniquely qualified to provide the Conunission with information regarding the intent of the statute. Each of the comments provided by lawmakers states that their intent to 'close the borders' for Tier I solar credit qualifications was consistent with the design utilized by a number of our neighboring states to promote economic development. This interpretation is consistent with the supplemental interpretation provided in our Joint Statement and contrary to the proposal of the Conunission in its TIO. Senators Jay Costa and John T. Yudichak descriptively summarize the sentiments and intentions of these lawmakers, stating the following:

 

The Commission's proposed interpretation under the Tentative Implementation Order published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin on January 6, 2018, would "grandfather" systems that are certified in Pennsylvania, rather than physically located in this state. We must respectfully disagree with this interpretation, which we find counter to the intentions of the General Assembly and especially of our colleagues who supported and voted in favor of this legislation.

 

Instead, the joint statement submitted by Chairperson Gladys M Brown and Vice Chairperson Andrew G. Place better reflects our intentions in approving this legislation. Please know that legislation to "close our solar borders" for the purposes of satisfying the Alternative Energy Standards Portfolio Act has been considered in recent sessions and discussions have been exclusive to the physical locations of systems.

 

While we certainly recognize the potential need to address and honor existing contracts, the long-term and primary goals set forth by this legislation have been clear. Specifically, we seek to join our neighboring states that similarly have "closed solar borders" and to advance our commitment to promoting economic and job growth within Pennsylvania's solar energy industry.4

 

In further support of interpreting Sections 2804(2)(i) and 2804(2)(ii) consistent with our Joint Statement, the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) states that the intention of this provision was to provide certainty that solar photovoltaic energy facilities located within the Commonwealth would not be affected by the changes implemented elsewhere in Act 40.5 DEP also submits that the interpretation outlined in the TIO would essentially nullify the purpose of Act 40 by grandfathering enough currently-certified sources to prevent the law from having any environmental or other co-benefit whatsoever. Comments from the Pennsylvania Farm Bureau also echo this sentiment, stating that TIO interpretation would limit farmers' options for compliance with ever-increasing environmental protection standards.6

 

 

 
 

4 Comments of Senator John T. Yndichak and Senator Jay Costa filed on February 2, 2018.

5 Joint comments of the DEP and Governor Tom Wolf (DEP section at page 1) filed February 5, 2018.

6 Comments of the Pennsylvania Fann Bureau submitted February 5, 2018.


Further, ET Capital Solar Partners submits that the Commission's tentative interpretation of Section 2804(2)(i) would make the additional language of Section 2804(2)(ii) redundant.7 ET Capital Solar Partners states that if the legislative intent of Section 2804(2)(i) follows the Commission's tentative interpretation, there would be no need for the additional language of Section 2804(2)(ii) to further protect existing facilities that have entered into agreements with Pennsylvania electric-distribution companies (EDCs) and electric generation suppliers (EGSs) participating in the Pennsylvania markets. Therefore, ET Capital Solar Partners contends that the language of Section 2804(2)(ii) is further evidence that the legislative intent of Act 40 of2017 is to stimulate further investment in solar facilities within the Commonwealth. Again, the rules of statutory construction are guiding here. 1 Pa. C.S. § 1922(2) states the following:

 

In ascertaining the intention of the General Assembly in the enactment of a statute the following presumptions, among others, may be used:

 

(2) That the General Assembly intends the entire statute to be effective and certain.

 

Case law further clarifies the interpretation of this provision, stating that the General Assembly does not intend words to be "mere surplusage." 8

 

When reviewing the totality of comments described above, it becomes evident that Sections 2804(1)(i), 2804(1)(ii), and 2804(1)(iii) explicitly describe the qualifications for Tier I Solar facilities after passage of Act 40; Section 2804(2)(i) clarifies that all Tier I Solar facilities certified before passage of Act 40 that are located within the geographic boundaries of Pennsylvania are to be held harmless from this legislation; and Section 2804(2)(ii) enjoins the legislation from breaching existing contracts from out-of-state Tier I Solar facilities which were entered into before passage to serve the AEPS needs of Pennsylvania entities. Therefore, we believe we must support the adoption of our interpretations of Sections 2804(2)(i) and 2804(2)(ii) in a manner consistent with our Joint Statement to the TIO. These interpretations are as follows:

 

Sections 2804(2)(i) - We interpret the phrase "[a] certification originating within the geographicalboundariesofthisCommonwealth..."asafacilitylocatedwithinPennsylvania havingreceivedanAEPsTierIsolarphotovoltaic sharecertification.

 

2804(2)(ii)- We interpret this section to only permit out-of-state facilities that are (a) alreadycertifiedasAEPSTierISolarPhotovoltaicandthat(b)haveenteredintoacontractwith a Pennsylvania EDC or EGS serving Pennsylvania customers, for the sale of solar credits, to maintain certification until the expiration of the contract. We further wish to clarify that, consistentwiththecommentsprovidedbyETCapital SolarPartners,thismaintained

 
 

7 Comments of ET Solar Capital Partners submitted January 17, 2018.

8 Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Inc. v. Pa. Department of Labor and Industry, 162 A.3d 384, 393 (Pa.

2017), see also Holland v. March, 883 A.2d 449, 455-56 (Pa. 2005); Green Acres Contracting Comp. v. Commonwealth, 163 A.3d 1147 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2017) and Pa. State Police, Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement v. Legion Post 304 Home Assoc., 164 A.3d 612,619 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2017) (holding that the rules of statutory constructionrequirethatcourts,wheneverpossible,giveeachwordinastatutorysectionmeaningandnottreatany word as surplusage).


certification should only be applicable to the amount of credits contractually committed to by an out-of-state certified facility to an EDC or EGS.9 EDCs and EGSs seeking to qualify credits under this provision are required to file a Petition within 60 days of the entry date of this order. Procedures for the 2804(2)(ii) contract approval process will be provided by the Commission at this docket.

 

Given this interpretation, we are also required to provide implementation procedures associated with banked credits. The AEPS Act permits EDCs and EGSs to bank, or place in reserve, credits produced in one reporting year for compliance in the next two reporting years.10 Implementation procedures are necessary to address handling of a credit generated by an out-of­ state Tier I solar qualified facility before October 30, 2017, and not retired in PJM's Generation Attribute Tracking System before October 30, 2017. Since Act 40 omits any directive expressly empowering the Commission to modify the attributes of such credits, we believe that these credits should retain the tier attribute assigned at the time the credit was generated. To do otherwise would appear to modify the legal status, or tier attribute, of a credit without explicit statutory authority. The Statutory Construction Act does not presume retroactive effect of statutes. 1 Pa. C.S. § 1926 provides:

 No statute shall be construed to be retroactive unless clearly and manifestly so intended by the General Assembly.

 

Further, the Commonwealth Court case provides guidance here when it determined the following:

 

A retroactive law is one which relates back to and gives a previous transaction a legal effect different.from that which it had under the law in effect when it transpired. This Court has held that "[a} law is given retroactive effect when it is used to impose new legal burdens on a past transaction or occurrence. " R & P Services, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Revenue, 541 A.2d 432, 434

(Pa.Cmwlth.1988).However,section1926oftheStatuto1yConstructionAct providesthat"nostatutemaybeconstruedtoberetroactiveunlessclearlyand manifestlysointendedbythe GeneralAssembly."  1 Pa.CS.§19261.1

 

Therefore, given Act 40's omission of any directive to change the attribute of these banked credits, we submit that any out-of-state Tier I solar credit generated before October 30, 2017, should retain its Tier I solar attribute for the banking life span enumerated in AEPS. This interpretation is supported by the comments of the Retail Energy Supply Association, who states that EGSs may elect to procure varying vintage credits for use in future years in accordance with the prevailing banking rules, thus, the ability to rely on banked credits is an important component necessary for EGSs to effectively manage and satisfy their AEPS Act obligations.12

 

 

 
 

9 For purposes of implementation, any alteration, such as a change, update, or extension to a contract applicable

under this provision, and, entered into after October 30, 2017, would not be recognized under 2804(2)(i).

10 The Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards Act of 2004, 73 P.S. §§ 1648.3(e)(6)

ll Kuziakv. Borough of Danville, 125 A.3d470 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2015).

12 Comments of the Retail Energy Supply Association at 7.


In conclusion, we submit that the interpretations provided herein are necessarily required by this Commission consistent with the rules of statutory construction enumerated supra and also consistent with 1 Pa. C.S. § 1921(a), which provides that:

 The object of all interpretation and construction of statutes is to ascertain and effectuate the intention of the General Assembly. Every statute shall be construed, if possible, to give effect to all its provisions.

 

With this Order we begin the process of implementing Act 40, while recognizing that there are complexities in implementing and complying with the Act that may reveal issues which require further Commission action. The Commission will address any such issues, at this docket, and in a manner that provides all interested parties appropriate notice and opportunity to be heard.

 THEREFORE, WE MOVE THAT:

(1) ElectricDistributionCompaniesandElectricGenerationSuppliers seeking to qualify credits under Section 2804(2)(ii) of Act 40 are requiredtofileaPetitionwithinsixty(60)daysoftheentrydateof thisorder,thespecificprocedures forwhichwillbeoutlinedatthis docket

 (2)  TheLawBureauandtheBureauofTechnicalUtilityServicesprepare a Final Implementation Order consistent with thisMotion.

 

DISCLAIMER: This article contains forward looking statements. Actual market action could differ materially from those anticipated. Sellers of SRECs should do their own research. Actual SREC production may differ significantly from those estimates. The company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement.

TAGS:
PennsylvaniaSREC

A New Solar Law, Short Term Gain for a Few, Long Term Loss for NJ Residents

 

The following is a write-up by Michael Flett – President of Flett Exchange, LLC in response to the passage of A-3723 in the New Jersey legislature and now on the desk of Governor Murphy to sign into law.

Renewable energy in America affects everyone today. The societal benefits are obvious - less pollution and infinite energy. In New Jersey, solar energy production is subsidized by the public either as a taxpayer through federal or state incentives or as a regular electricity consumer. They need to be part of the conversation.

Where is the support for this bill?

Due to the widespread benefits and costs one would assume that when crafting solar legislation it would include any and all stakeholders. That was not the case here in New Jersey where a renewable energy bill was quietly folded into a three bill package that included a nuclear subsidy bill and a health care insurance bill!  The environmental community, who you would think, strongly supports renewable energy called for the process to slow down for a more deliberative process in order to create a long term program that would include community solar, not just a “pilot” program. That was certainly not the case with this bill. A small group of solar owners along with financial solar dealers spearheaded the quick passage of this bill in Trenton. If enacted, this law would close the successful free-market SREC program for all future solar development after 2021. As written, it will come at a multibillion dollar cost to ratepayers and divert future payments away from new solar development.  All coming about without the widespread support and dialogue with environmentalists, ratepayers, business owners or even the majority of the homeowners or businesses that invested on solar on their homes and businesses. Flett Exchange has thousands of customers who own solar in New Jersey. These investments were made because of the SREC program and this bill extinguishes that program and causes uncertainty.

SREC = Competition = Fairness

New Jersey has been a nationwide leader for 15 years in solar development. The reason for this success is the open and competitive nature of our incentive program based on the SREC. New Jersey, in its wisdom over a decade ago, made the decision to let the market decide the most economical price for solar to bring in investment and at the same time protect the ratepayer.  Due to the rapid reduction in cost of solar, an adjustment in the states’ law around solar was made in 2012. It worked beautifully. Solar was built. State renewable goals were met. The price to the ratepayer dropped as well. There was absolute freedom for homeowners and business to compete and install solar and earn SRECs.

Due to the success of the SREC program, New Jersey achieved all of its solar build-out goals and under budget. Now, like in 2012, the laws need to be adjusted to bring in the next phase of investment in New Jersey. Consistency needs to be maintained to maintain investor confidence, protect the ratepayer, protect past investments in solar infrastructure and bring more solar to everyone. The open and free SREC market is that tool. It allows for the freedom to compete and allow homeowners and business to install solar. It ensures that if prices drop for solar energy technology in the future, the public who pays for it with their electricity bill, will not be stuck for decades with long term contracts.  The proponents of this bill are only interested in maximizing their rate of return when it comes time to selling their solar projects. They do not have the public’s interest at heart. We can do better.

Now, like in 2012, the cost to install solar has again plummeted.  The state law can be adjusted to bring in the next phase of investment in NJ based on a free and open market called the SREC. The current bill phases out the tools that made New Jersey a solar leader.

Why Remove Fairness from a Successful Program?

Why? Because by closing the SREC program large solar owners will land a multi-billion dollar payday.

Here’s how:

There are over 2,000 Mw of solar installed statewide. There are a few owners with control of 100 Mw each. Based on current free market SREC prices, the typical owner of 100 Mw of solar will earn $50 to $70 million dollars over the next 10 years in SREC payments. (This revenue is based on the forward 10 year curve of SREC prices in a freely traded SREC market prior to the run-up in prices due to this bill)

A-3723, as written, abolishes the SREC market and maximize payments. Those same large owners will earn $250 million in the next 10 years – a $180 to $200 million windfall – each. (The back-end of the SREC curve moves up due to the artificial demand created by this bill) If you add up the total amount for all 2000 Mw installed in New Jersey the cost to the ratepayer over 10 years is $8.5 billion – up from $1.4 to $2.8 billion based on the freely traded SREC. This bill as written will cost the ratepayers of New Jersey $5.7 to $7.1 billion more over 10 years! The majority of this money builds NO new solar! These projects will be sold quickly and when the real costs materialize the public will demand action. To put this in perspective, $6 billion would build an additional 3,000 Mw of new solar at an install cost of $2 a watt. $2 a watt is a fair install price for new solar for medium sized distributed systems that would benefit typical small business’ and homeowners in New Jersey.

The proponents of the legislation have provided one sided cost analysis. All the press releases and articles actually mention that it will save money which is only attainable in economic models in which the inputs are misleading and statistically near impossible.

How do we Maintain Fairness?

The New Jersey legislature and governor need to address solar development today as it was addressed in 2012. All stakeholders have to be heard. The cost analysis needs to be vetted. A clear path forward for the cost of solar development in the future needs to be planned. Plain and simple the path is:

  • Maintain open and free access to solar for all investors - SRECs
  • Maintain the competitive nature of the SREC market to protect ratepayers
  • Increase solar requirements – increase RPS
  • Decrease costs- (solar is cheaper now) – decrease the SACP
  • Introduce community solar
  • Maintain and grow the solar labor market

A-3723 demands closure of the SREC market and re-direction of ratepayer funds away from long term new solar build-out that we have today. A clear reversal of past success.

The passage of A-3723 deviates from all of the success of the market based program that is responsible for the financing of over 80,000 solar installations in New Jersey. If enacted the bill will result in a quick short-term boost in SREC payments to investors of solar in New Jersey. This has happened already in the run-up in prices from $170 to $240 in the past 6 months because of the prospect of the legislation being passed. In reality, owners of solar are being duped into supporting this legislation because of the short-term run-up in prices. In the long term it puts all solar investment in New Jersey at risk by replacing free-market mechanisms by a law that is vague in its long-term support of solar. It de-links past investment in solar from future long-term solar build out. This is a dangerous proposition for those who own solar and rely on SRECs to pay back their investment in the clean energy future of New Jersey.

Short-Term Flips – No Long-Term Path – Sorry, New Jersey

Not one segment wins in the passage of this law except for a few select solar financers. In the next few years they will be able to flip projects for huge profits to unsuspecting investors who will get caught holding the bag in the long term. New Jersey homeowners and businesses who invested in solar and relying on SRECs will be in limbo without the continuation of the SREC program. Finally, and most importantly, the environment loses, the ratepayer loses, labor loses, and the new Investor in solar loses. When the costs are calculated in the next few years it will be apparent at the magnitude of ratepayer funds that were squandered and could have been used in an efficient manner to build out our renewable energy future. The right choice is to continue with a competitive and free incentive SREC market for the benefit of everyone in New Jersey as outlined above.

This bill is not law until Governor Murphy signs it. He can also significantly change it so it retains SRECs, maintains competition, and protects current solar investors and ratepayers or veto it and start over. Most importantly, the bill needs to be changed so that ratepayer funds are used in the most efficient manner to achieve our renewable energy goals. 

 

DISCLAIMER: This article contains forward looking statements. Actual market action could differ materially from those anticipated. Sellers of SRECs should do their own research. Actual SREC production may differ significantly from those estimates. The company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement.

TAGS:
New JerseySREC

Price Convergence of 2017 and 2018 SRECs

As expected, the prices of the 2017 vintage New Jersey SRECs are starting to converge with the prices of the 2018 vintages. Prices for 2017 were trading in the $220 to $230 range in recent weeks and have moved down to the $170 level today. After some up and down movement in the next few months they will be trading at a $5 discount to the 2018s which are now at $175.

The sudden move happened because there was an orderly expiration of the July delivery of the 2017 vintage SREC futures contract on Intercontinental Exchange. There was over 230,000 contracts in open interest in the July 2017 contract which is close to 10% of the whole years SREC obligation by all energy suppliers. Futures contracts can exhibit volatility in the last few trading days going into expiration if there is an imbalance of physical to deliver against the futures contract. For this reason the prices were held up for a longer period of time until the contract expired. The lack of volatility in this expiration means that all sellers had procured enough SRECs to satisfy delivery in the GATs by Monday, July, 31st.

The 2017 energy year is expected to be oversupplied by 7%. In the 2018 energy year it is expected that the installed solar in the whole state will oversupply the energy companies mandated compliance by about 14%. This is the reason why the 2018 vintage is trading at a discount to the 2017 prices last year. Of course the prices will move during the year as we see how much new solar is installed.